Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: facedown; GregoryFul
"I was trying to explain the practical and cost reasons that ethanol is not transported by pipeline. Sheesh."

Yes, but Gregoryful was trying to float that red herring (pipeline corrosion) as support for Williams blatant screwup about ethanol plants producing 95% ethanol and how it was "bad for cars" because of the water content.

I simply haven't studied the issue of pipeline corrosion by ethanol (I HAVE studied pipeline corrosion by hydrogen--another red herring argument used to denigrate the hydrogen economy idea). But I'll pull out my "Corrosion Engineer's Handbook" and give it a quick look.

106 posted on 04/30/2008 7:43:13 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
Yes, but Gregoryful was trying to float that red herring (pipeline corrosion) as support for Williams blatant screwup about ethanol plants producing 95% ethanol and how it was "bad for cars" because of the water content.

So the capitalists who do not use pipelines to ship ethanol do not see it as a cheaper alternative to shipping it by truck? And their rationale is unknown to you?

151 posted on 05/03/2008 8:50:06 AM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson