Posted on 04/28/2008 9:53:50 PM PDT by paltz
Define "best." Does that include the cost in lives of slavery to the Mideast oil sheikhs? Being at the mercy of every bedouin's whim?
Ethanol isn't THE answer. But it is AN answer.
The key is the mix. We burn oil and natural gas to make electricity we should use coal and nukes. We can make gas out of coal and we can burn gas in our cars.
“Ethanol isn’t THE answer. But it is AN answer. “
I completely disagree. We have plenty of natural gas and oil to power cars.
As I've explained a thousand times on these threads, the corn being used for ethanol production is NOT Libby's or Green Giant sweet corn. It is FEED corn, the stuff that gets fed to cattle, hogs, and sheep. What's significant about THAT fact is that the nutrients in that corn remain after the sugars for ethanol have been extracted. Corn is primarily fed for its protein content, and high-lysine hybrids retain most of their proteins after the fermentation process. The residue, called distiller's dried grain, is still a valuable feed stock.
In essence, ethanol corn does double duty: first as a fuel supplement, then as a feed grain. So the argument that we're "burning food" is utter poppycock.
I am open to just about anything that is reasoned.
I know some of you folks get rather exasperated that laymen shoot their mouths off on forums like this.
We laymen wouldn’t be shooting our mouths off if those who knew what they were doing had done something in the 70s.
At this point, I’m going to be a real pain in the posterior until folks who know everything get off their duffs and put an end to our exposure to Middle-Eastern blackmail.
I’m willing to be nice about it, but I’ve waited over thirty years and I’m not waiting another thirty.
We need to be energy self-suffient today. And I’ll join anyone who wants to go nose to nose with the assholes on the left, who block everything that is reasoned.
I’m also willing to go nose to nose with those who think everything is just peachy now, and we don’t need to change.
I’m sure you and I share overall goals here. I’m just getting a wee bit testy over it. Not with you in particular, I hope you know.
We use very little petroleum to make electricity. Much of what we do use is residual oil and petroleum coke. Refinery "leftovers" after products like gasoline and diesel have been removed from the crude oil.
U.S. Electric Power Industry Net Generation, 2006
Electric Power Annual
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html
That’s an interesting arguement, one that I think I can buy into. Thanks. Good points.
It is not a factor of cost.
Water is not an energy source.
You can separate it into hydrogen but like ALL energy conversions it requires more energy than you start with.
It is a better plan to use your source energy than waste energy converting it into hydrogen.
I’m extremely happy about this also. I have seen this coming for decades. I remember seeing oil on the beach in SoCal and the idiots thought it was from offshore platforms and tankers but it was just natural seepage.
Just drove me nuts.
I’m not specifically pissed about imports from the ME. I live in FL and really hate the we import from canada and mexico. We have so much here in FL. Meanwhile all that canadian oil money comes down here every winter and they suck as bad as any arab I know.
Thanks Grampa
Since %90+ of oil is used in transportation...
Why not diesel from coal?
Where do you get your hydrgen from?
Every method I know of is very enegy intensive(electrolosis, cracking of natural gas).
20% natural gas.
Yes, and if the CO2 alarmists have their way, the coal percentage will go down, forcing the Natural Gas higher.
(Natural Gas is one of the quickest and cheapest initial investment to expand)
Ethanol FUD.
....How many of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi?.....
That’s irrelevant.
Your isolationist bent is harmful to our country. Trade is the engine that drives America.
One-way “Free Trade” which sucks industry and wealth out of America, to our enemies, is not an engine driving America.
It is a disaster.
I've heard/read this before and dismissed it. Now that Walter Williams writes it, I have to wonder. If this is true, how can anyone consider using ethanol as a fuel?
You know obviously about the Destin Dome. Only one formation off the coast of FL. I’d say that at current prices and with new technology and the conservative nature and process of guessing recoverable amounts this is the first next place that should be explored.
Even if you are paying $1.25 for the dime's worth of corn-based ethanol?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.