Two methodologies used by atheist/secular humanist/evolutionists to “prove” their theology -
“extravagent extrapolation”
“proof by arrogant condescension”
1. Argument by Namecalling. In your short post you did this several times. Examples: using the non-word "evolutionist," subsequently labeling scientists "atheists" and "secular humanists," and then referring to evolutionary science as "theology."
2. Argument by absurdism. Example: "I haven't ever seen a frog turn into a prince, so evolution can't be occuring!"
3. Argument by fable. "Somebody told me once that way back in 1921, scientists discovered a dinosaur and a cave man in the same rock strata. So there!"