However, as we saw in 1998, it was the Senate's duty just to rule on guilt or innocence, not on "impeachable offenses." Groups sometimes exceed their charge, but in this case, I think the delegates are going to duck their responsibility and somehow say this "belongs in the courts." The delegates CANNOT be perceived as either going "against the will of the people" as determined by popular vote, nor can they be perceived as going against the black guy, who has a tiny delegate lead (by that time).
I still predict, before this is over, it will go to the courts, and Obama will try to block FL and MI citing . . .
Bush v. Gore.
At that time, we're gonna hear what a brilliant decision that was by the USSC.
Is this too funny or what?
Sweet!
I, for one, would ^love^ this to go to the courts. The perfect ruling would be:
“Free association applies. Rules are the responsibility of the group. This has no business being in the courts.
Your primary votes are no more federally protected than your American Idol votes!”