Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephen Hawking calls for Moon and Mars colonies
New Scientist ^ | 4/21/08 | David Shiga

Posted on 04/21/2008 11:18:04 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Stephen Hawking called for a massive investment in establishing colonies on the Moon and Mars in a lecture in honour of NASA's 50th anniversary. He argued that the world should devote about 10 times as much as NASA's current budget – or 0.25% of the world's financial resources – to space.

The renowned University of Cambridge physicist has previously spoken in favour of colonising space as an insurance policy against the possibility of humanity being wiped out by catastrophes like nuclear war and climate change. He argues that humanity should eventually expand to other solar systems.

But in a speech in Washington, DC, US, delivered in honour of NASA's 50th anniversary in 2008, Hawking focused on near-term possibilities, backing the space agency's goals of returning astronauts to the Moon by 2020 and sending humans to Mars soon after that.

The Moon is a good place to start because it is "close by and relatively easy to reach", Hawking said. "The Moon could be a base for travel to the rest of the solar system," he added. Mars would be "the obvious next target", with its abundant supplies of frozen water, and the tantalising possibility that life may have been present there in the past.

Some space experts have recently called for NASA to send astronauts to a near-Earth asteroid instead of the Moon as a next step.

Hawking did not mention the idea, but said that any long-term site for a human base should have a significant gravity field. That's because long missions in microgravity lead to health issues such as bone loss.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: colonies; freepun; hawking; mars; moon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2008 11:18:04 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The renowned University of Cambridge physicist has previously spoken in favour of colonising space as an insurance policy against the possibility of humanity being wiped out by catastrophes like nuclear war and climate change.

What a joke. As if the moon would be safe from climate change or an asteroid.

2 posted on 04/21/2008 11:24:35 PM PDT by taxesareforever (We'll never forget Matt Maupin and his service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
In 1969, nearly 40 years ago, man first set foot on the moon. So what have we done lately?

Let's get this frigging show on the road allready so my great grandchildren will have a shot at doing the things I had dreamed of doing as a boy, and which we could have done by now.

Instead, the treasure and sweat of this country has been whizzed away trying to support a class of voluntarily nonproductive and unappeasable people who are only expanding.

3 posted on 04/21/2008 11:28:09 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I like the idea in theory, but realistically we’re still a couple hundred years from actually being able to do it successfully.


4 posted on 04/21/2008 11:32:29 PM PDT by beachdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Sometimes even geniuses have silly ideas. Humanity’s problems will follow us wherever we run. I say we solve our problems on Earth before we spend so much energy flying into space trying to escape ourselves.


5 posted on 04/21/2008 11:41:38 PM PDT by TheThinker (Capitalism is the natural result of a democratic government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe; All
It will happen when venture capital realizes the net worth of the resources available in the asteroid belt alone. Trick is to build orbital colonies so you don't constant consume planetary fuel to escape gravity.

Anyway, its all covered in this book Mining the Sky

The resources described show how even such a high cost, high risk venture could return nearly unlimited profit. Earth's entire "domestic" GDP would be insignificant.

6 posted on 04/22/2008 12:26:37 AM PDT by underground (Viva la Socialisme Wall Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I firmly believe man's future awaits us in the stars. We must grow and expand. We must One day leave this world and seek a life elsewhere.
One day man will sail the gulf between the stars as we sail our own seas today.But getting there will be hard. There will be heart ache and pain, death and sorrow on the road. But it is a road we must travel. Or all we know,All that has come before and all we plan today, every dream, every thought of all the ages will be lost forever.

Ad Astra per aspera
A rough road leads to the stars...

7 posted on 04/22/2008 12:31:51 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Having all of humanity in one fragile ecosystem will inevitablly lead to our extinction. Extinction events do happen, the last one being 70,000 years ago when the Toba supervolcano exploded. Only a few thousand humans are thought to have survived. The yellowstone supervolcano is about twice the size that Toba was, and could go anytime, or in 100,000 years. Multiple self-sufficient space colonies would guarentee our survival as a species no matter the event.


8 posted on 04/22/2008 12:57:08 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Hawking dumped his wife, married his nurse, and lost my interest.


9 posted on 04/22/2008 12:58:58 AM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever; doug from upland

I have this image in my head...

...of Alvin and the Chipmunks joining Hawking,

accompanied by Joan Baez, singing

In the Year 2525....


10 posted on 04/22/2008 1:38:07 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
a class of voluntarily nonproductive and unappeasable people who are only expanding.

We call those people "Democrats".

11 posted on 04/22/2008 1:44:32 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (It takes a father to raise a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

well! now that hawkins is on board maybe something will finally get done. Sure. When we think of what we stand to gain from the project, I wonder why peopel need convincing, but then there are always critics of other people’s gain, even if they will share that gain.


12 posted on 04/22/2008 3:24:29 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
As if the moon would be safe from climate change

Having had pretty much the same hot and extremely dry climate for the past almost 4 Billion years, it's a pretty safe bet the Moon is in little risk of climate "change," which is a redundancy regardless since "change" is a part of climate. Asteroids? As safe as Earth, underground.

What cruel is that Richard Branson plans on risking this mans's life in a suborbital ride... and performing a marriage on that first flight, too.

13 posted on 04/22/2008 3:29:06 AM PDT by Prospero (Ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Amen to all that, Amigo. It's plain sad that we're taking longer to gear up to return pretty much the way we should have in 1973, and the sorry Congress won't allow for funding enough to get back there until the late "teens"

In the unlikely event Obama is elected, you can kiss this good bye, because he is so ignorant of the NASA budget he thinks he can nationalize Day Care throughout the US on a budget exceeded by the Department of education by almost 4 times.

14 posted on 04/22/2008 3:32:16 AM PDT by Prospero (Ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: underground
The high Delta V for mining the Asteroids, as inviting as that may be, can be more easily accomplished by using God's natural pier, the moon, and a few rail guns...

And don't give up on the Moon. The Japanese Kayuga has discovered Uranium on the surface... turns out lunar morphology ain't what was suspected.

There's a solid metal asteroid out there, by the way... no one is quite sure what kind of metal, but it's a half-mile of something heavy, and it ain't carbon.

15 posted on 04/22/2008 3:35:49 AM PDT by Prospero (Ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

“Hawking dumped his wife, married his nurse, and lost my interest.”

That affects his scientific credibility how?
Besides which, neither you nor I have any idea why his marriage really ended, so what gives you the right to judge?


16 posted on 04/22/2008 3:45:51 AM PDT by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: beachdweller

U kiddin us? Two hundred years ago was just a few short years after Franklin had done his kite deal and got zapped.

There were no electric motors. There were no lightbulbs. Clocks and paper itself were still an expensive rarity. As was a good soap.

We could easily have a base on the moon in a decade if we had the stones to decide to do it.


17 posted on 04/22/2008 4:00:20 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Hawking thinks mankind is it’s own worst enemy. I think he’s bitter about his condition.


18 posted on 04/22/2008 4:24:06 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Space travel as it presently exists is a socialist enterprise. It may have been justified in the 1950s and 1960s due to our rivalry with the USSR. It was a matter of prestige for us to have beaten the braggart Soviets to the moon. The myth of Communist technical prowess was shattered. In the 1980s, Reagan put the Evil Empire out of its misery. However, those days are over. In fact, NASA has made numerous efforts to internationalize space travel, inviting even Russian and Chinese participation in American space programs.

If you look back at the Age of Exploration, you will find that the European nations were motivated primarily by trade considerations, and later by the extraction of the wealth of the New World, in gold, silver, and other commodities. The explorations were done primarily from a profit motive, and direct state subsidies ended as the explorations became self-sustaining. In the case of the Dutch and the English, a state licensed private company was in charge of much of the exploration of the New World.

19 posted on 04/22/2008 4:34:18 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thundrey

“Besides which, neither you nor I have any idea why his marriage really ended, so what gives you the right to judge?”

The same thing that gives you the right to ask him.


20 posted on 04/22/2008 4:36:58 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson