Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another largish Midwest aftershock (just now)
USGS ^ | April 22, 2008 | USGS

Posted on 04/20/2008 10:54:25 PM PDT by kc8ukw

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: DoughtyOne

A sandblow / sandboil just west of New Madrid, from Google Earth.
61 posted on 04/21/2008 6:29:05 PM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

A Tour through the New Madrid Seismic Zone
http://www.showme.net/~fkeller/quake/tour.htm#littleprairie


62 posted on 04/21/2008 7:01:04 PM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

That’s wild. I don’t think I’ve heard of sand-blows before. I would have thought of sink-holes before I would have come up with that one. Thanks for the response and the informative link.


63 posted on 04/21/2008 8:03:59 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (It doesn't matter he isn't conservative. Now it doesn't matter if it's not Constitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

Very nice. I like both of those links. I’m going to have to check them out in more detail in the morning.

BTW, if a 4.0 gets things going like that, imagine a full bore New Madrid shaker. I don’t like the idea at all.

I know this is going to be a bit of a stretch, but I also have some concerns for regions in Missouri and nearby states where mining was really big over the last century.

Around Galena, Kansas and the Joplin, Missouri area the ground was honeycombed with mining. What happens when those areas get a big shaker? Is there going to be massive settling?


64 posted on 04/21/2008 8:08:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (It doesn't matter he isn't conservative. Now it doesn't matter if it's not Constitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

Thanks for that fascinating link.

My husband and I slept through the aftershock early this morning, but our daughter felt it, as she had just laid down to go to sleep.

She thought one of the cats had jumped on her bed, but when she looked, she didn’t see any of them. She heard something fall in her room, and got up and looked to see which cat was to blame. There was no cat to be found, and after being slightly freaked out for a minute or so, she went to sleep.

I guess we now know that a cat, jumping onto the bed, is approximately the same as a 4.0 quake.


65 posted on 04/21/2008 8:32:54 PM PDT by SelmaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SelmaLee

The whole website is very interesting.
The main page is here...
http://showme.net/~fkeller/quake/index.htm


66 posted on 04/21/2008 8:54:48 PM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
another earthquake mystery

Earthquake lights

Earthquake lights have been seen since ancient times. 1811-12 New Madrid quake eyewitnesses saw them possibly from as far away as Savannah GA. They were first photographed in 1968 in Japan. USGS admits their existence.

Records of earthquakes that were accompanied by sky lights can be found in 373 BC in ancient Greek writings, that “immense columns of flame” foretold the earthquake that destroyed the cities of Helike and Bura.

However, even in the early 20th century they were still considered a myth, until photographs of actual lights were taken in Japan in the 1960s.

William Leigh Pierce, a traveler on the Mississippi, observed, “On the 30th of November, 1811 about one half hour before sun-rise, two vast electrical columns shot up from the eastern horizon, until their heads reached the zenith” — from Feldman book

more info here...
http://showme.net/~fkeller/quake/maps.htm#lights

67 posted on 04/21/2008 8:59:18 PM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

That too is very interesting. Thanks for the mention. I looked at some of the photos. Kindof makes you wonder if these lights don’t precede every earthquake, but are seldom noticed.

If so, some sort warning system might ensue.


68 posted on 04/22/2008 12:48:18 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (It doesn't matter he isn't conservative. Now it doesn't matter if it's not Constitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

There is some “small” triangular activity going on in the last few days or so. Keep in mind that the Wabash Valley Zone (in IL/IN) has been very quiet for sometime before the Friday 4/18 4:37am central time 5.2 quake (UTC 9:37am)

I find it all very interesting even if it means nothing.

Check out these 2 pages (open each one in a new window)

(one is a location map and the other is the data for the location map)

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/32.42.-90.-80.php

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/32.42.-90.-80_eqs.php (deduct 5 hours off the UTC times to get the actual Central time)


69 posted on 04/22/2008 9:17:01 PM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: All
Geological Survey Updates Earthquake Threat Map
Apr 22, 2008
http://www.wctv.tv/news/headlines/18022859.html



Colors on this map show the levels of horizontal shaking that have a 2-in-100 chance of being exceeded in a 50-year period. Shaking is expressed as a percentage of g (g is the acceleration of a falling object due to gravity). (Credit: Image courtesy of U.S. Geological Survey)


According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the following changes were made on the map:

Several new faults were included or revised as a source of earthquake ground shaking in California, the Pacific Northwest and the Intermountain West.

The Wasatch fault in Utah was modeled to include the possibility of a magnitude-7.4 earthquake, in addition to smaller earthquakes along the fault.

The model for earthquakes along the New Madrid Seismic Zone in the Central United States includes a wider range of possible magnitudes and return periods between major earthquakes. The model was also adjusted to allow for sequences of earthquakes to occur in groups of three within a few years time, similar to what occurred in 1811 - 1812.

Offshore faults were added as possible sources of earthquakes near Charleston, S.C.

For the Cascadia Subduction Zone, more weight was given to a magnitude-9 earthquake that ruptures the length of the subduction zone, versus multiple smaller magnitude-8 earthquakes that fill the zone over the same 500-year time period.


Here is the older map...


New map (again)

70 posted on 04/22/2008 9:45:48 PM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

About all I can say, is that I’m glad I’m not living in that region right now. This activity may signify nothing, and then again it may be a reawakening of the fault zone.


71 posted on 04/23/2008 11:58:36 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (It doesn't matter he isn't conservative. Now it doesn't matter if it's not Constitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: kc8ukw

We just had another 4.2 quake on the same fault (Wabash Valley)

April 25, 2008
at 12:31 pm central time

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/32.42.-95.-85_eqs.php


72 posted on 04/25/2008 11:03:14 AM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson