Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head

Yeah? I would agree with you if the FBI didn’t sign this contract with Lockheed

http://blog.newyorkcitycommunity.us/2008/04/05/corzine-china-and-the-memorandum-of-trade.aspx
(see added comments below thread)

>>>>The government could have imposed a maximum fine of US$15 million, and a ban on exporting satellites or satellite technology for up to three years, if the government had prevailed on all 30 counts of the charges in a proceeding before an administrative law judge.<<<

Woo, good thing they didn’t get banned, otherwise, they wouldn’t have gotten that contract:

http://blog.barofintegrity.us/2008/02/13/fbi-announces-contract-award-for-next-generation-identification-system.aspx
FBI Announces Contract Award for Next Generation Identification System

Lockheed partnered with Savi Technology to deliver it.

Savi Technology, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin, and Hutchinson Port Holdings, a subsidiary of Hutchison Whampoa Limited of Hong Kong, controlled by Chinese billionaire Li Ka Shing. Savi Technology owns 51 percent of Savi Networks and Hutchinson 49 percent.

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a Washington-based foundation, charged that Hutchinson is “a front for the Chinese government,” citing a Central Intelligence Agency analysis from 1998 concluding that Li Ka Shing “is directly connected to Beijing and is willing to use his business influence to further the aims of the Chinese government.”

Last month Defense issued its annual report on Chinese military capabilities to Congress, which included sections on increased use of information warfare. Philip Coyle, senior adviser for the Center for Defense Information, a Washington-based think tank focused on defense and security issues, said that if the Pentagon is “going to keep making China out to be an enemy, DoD should have security concerns about a Chinese-owned company running a U.S. Army information network.”

http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/070523-China-Military-Power-final.pdf

Good thing we have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Chinese Government!


70 posted on 04/20/2008 3:39:41 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia

As I said, the trade policy has continued and it is destructive to our interests. At the same time we have beefed up ourt military presence and I know that there are planners who are advising that we stand up to them.


71 posted on 04/20/2008 3:44:59 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Calpernia

WHAT are they thinking? Who are the dingbats running our national security? This is like the KEYSTONE COPS, and I just can’t believe the ignorance where sensitive material is concerned. The insane inmates are running the asylum.
We need to riot as conservatives for some better government..sheesh! AND SOME LAWS are needed to prevent the selling of sensitive items pertaining to national security.


89 posted on 04/20/2008 4:36:10 PM PDT by Kackikat ((No strong national security, and the rest of issues are mute points; chaos ensues.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson