Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Manly Warrior
Why isn't the crucial area teflonized?

Is the problem powder residue sticking to the works when they get hot
or that talc-like dust combining with the powder residue?
I also understand that the M4 action won't cycle when muddy?

And what is the commercial name of the lube you recommend. I like Dry-Slide, but by now there must be something sexier.

54 posted on 04/08/2008 7:21:07 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (GOP Plank: Double Domestic Crude Production. Increase refining capacity 50 percent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Kenny Bunk

The entire upper receiver is coated with a teflon material.

The residue from propellants is not as much a problem as some make it out to be. Graphite is commonly used as a lubricant, and this is the bulk of the residue we are concerned about. Graphite is used a a retardant on the ball powder used, the issue is that the original specifications by Mr. Stoner called for IMR (extruded stick powder), which uses different chemistry to control burn rate, and produces less residue (usually).

The dust is a problem, but with proper lub, routine cleaning and common sense operator sheilding of their weapons, and good junior leadership, dust can be kept to a minimum. A magazine in place, dust cover closed, muzzle cover on, the M4 is pretty well protected.

Not sure of an equivalent dry lub available commercially, but the mil-spec is a tough coating that in my expereince lasts quite a while under hard use, I will look it up and see if I can find a mil-spec nomenclature.


66 posted on 04/09/2008 5:00:57 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US Army, Retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson