No, but nice attempt to mischaracterize what I posted.
Your “proper sequence” phrase simply is a dismissal that the “proper sequence” has to have some direction. It can’t “self organize” nor can it be the result of randomness. The Creator is there, and the atheists are the ones trying to “draw the curtain” over this obvious conclusion.
Now, maybe the two of us are arguing from the same viewpoint, and I misunderstood the thrust of your phrase “proper sequence” for the chemicals involved in conveying the information of life.
One good mischaracterization deserves another. ;)
Before nylon was invented by man, there was no ‘proper’ sequence for it, as it would convey no use, it would be a deficient (or perhaps ‘improper’) esterase enzyme (in one example).
What was the ‘proper’ sequence of a hemoglobin protein when the oxygen content of Earth's atmosphere was much higher? Now that it is lower do you think it took a ‘Wizard of Oz’ type of god to change it to what it now needed to be; or do you think that the mechanism for changing life built into the rules of the game were sufficient?
Most of the amino acids in hemoglobin could be replaced by several other amino acids without changing the oxygen handling dynamics of the protein. Yet out of these millions of possibilities only a few are actually used. Is this because it wouldn't be ‘proper’ to use the others?