They thought they might find more prohibited drugs. I'm saying those prohibited drugs could have been just about anything. I would not have been the least bit surprised if they found Ecstasy.
You totally rule out everything. Including more Advil. Of course, you rule it out because the article says nothing more was found. Making you right.
It has been reported that you have 12 guage shotgun shells concealed in your rectum. Please report to the nearest police station for a strip search - for your safety and the safety of society.
/absurd (i think)
Based on what, exactly? An uncorroborated accusation---an accusation in which the accuser herself admitted she didn't know if the accused had any of those prohibited drugs on her person---let alone stashed in her underwear or bra. The administrator made that leap all by himself; he's the one who decided to conduct a strip search when he could find nothing otherwise.
Once again, a questionable accusation from a person with a motive to lie is not exactly the kind of probable cause or reasonable suspicion you would expect one would need before conducting a strip search. Even you admit further up on the thread that there are other ways to handle this---involve the cops, for instance. The kind of person who would go from uncorroborated accusations straight to strip searches should be parking cars for a living; he should not be in any sort of position of authority.
You're really not fighting the good fight here.