Note: The following text is a quote:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020557.php
(DAILY MAIL.co.uk)
April 3, 2008
British Muslims ‘planned to kill thousands by bombing SEVEN transatlantic airliners in one go’
This is why you can’t carry your latte onto the plane anymore.
“It would have caused a civilian death toll on an ‘almost unprecedented scale’ and a ‘global impact’.” And they were ready to do it in the name of Islam — yet peaceful Muslims have made no large-scale attempt to disabuse such Muslims of this theology that the peaceful ones say they reject, and all too many law enforcement and government continue to ignore or downplay the Islamic aspect of their motivation, central as it is, as irrelevant.
From the Daily Mail (thanks to all who sent this in):
A British terror gang plotted to use liquid explosives to blow up transatlantic passenger jets in mid-flight, a court heard today.
Eight men planned to smuggle bombs disguised as soft drinks on to flights from Heathrow to the United States and Canada and detonate them on board, Woolwich crown court was told.
It would have caused a civilian death toll on an “almost unprecedented scale” and a “global impact”.
The gang allegedly targeted seven flights operated by Air Canada, United Airlines and American Airlines. [...]
Peter Wright QC, prosecuting, said they had planned, “all in the name of Islam”, to carry out a “series of coordinated and deadly explosions” and were “indifferent to the carnage” that would have been caused. [...]
“At the very least” seven planes would have been targeted, Mr Wright said.
The jury heard that the gang planned to smuggle components of the homemade bombs on to the flights as “innocuous hand luggage”.
The court heard the bombers intended to use hydrogen peroxide and mix it with a product called Tang, used in soft drinks, to turn it into an explosive.
They intended to carry it on board disguised as 500ml bottles of Oasis or Lucozade by using food dye to recreate the drinks’ distinctive colour.
The detonator would have been disguised as AA 1.5 batteries. The contents of the batteries would have been removed and an electric element such as a lightbulb or wiring would have been inserted.
A disposable camera would have provided a power source.
“These items would have the capability of being detonated with devastating consequences,” said Mr Wright....
Posted by Robert at April 3, 2008 5:11 PM