Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red Baron film celebrates German war hero
Telegraph,co.uk ^ | 01/04/2008 | Harry de Quetteville

Posted on 04/01/2008 3:16:51 PM PDT by wolf78

After decades of war-related silence and shame, Germany proudly celebrated a military hero last night, rolling out the red carpet for "Red" Baron von Richthofen.

The new attitude was on display as stars and celebrities, including British actor Joseph Fiennes, were due to gather for the Berlin premiere of a new film about the Baron.

It is set to mark a new departure for German war films, which usually reflect on the extremism, suffering and even lunacy of the Nazi era ­ if they get made at all.

The Red Baron in contrast, portrays a brilliant and honourable military figure whose life and early death in combat Germans can celebrate without blush.

The film, which at £14 million is one of Germany's most expensive productions, stars Matthias Schweighoefer as the renowned pilot thought to have shot down about 80 Allied airmen in World War One.

It is based on a biography of the pilot published last year, which opens with him engaged in a dogfight only to pull out when he sees his adversary's gun jammed.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: germany; redbaron; richthofen; vonrichthofen; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: brazzaville

I’d agree Marseille was the best ever. Hartmann was on the Eastern Front.

German Jagdeschwaders that had fought on both the Eastern and Western fronts considered the Eastern front a “vacation.”


41 posted on 04/01/2008 4:57:43 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

It is logical that Germany would be anxious to prepare for the contingency of Americas entrance into the war on the side of the Allies.
And it would be naive to think that every belligerent was not doing something of the sort.
And the frenzy created by Britains friends in the American press over the German Ambassadors inquiry was very effective indeed.
Do you imagine however that England would have enforced Canadian neutrality had the USA supported the Central Powers?


42 posted on 04/01/2008 5:06:14 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Rommel ignored and would not enforce Hitler’s “Commando Order” which decreed that Allied commandos and paratroops captured behind the lines were to summarily executed, even if they were in full uniform. Most other of the German generals fighting in the West ignored it as well but Rommel was pretty open in his defiance, and the order was eventually rescinded.


43 posted on 04/01/2008 5:25:21 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

Germany’s unrestricted submarine warfare drew us in. Up until the ‘unrestricted’ policy was announced we were as mad at the British as the Germans because of their surface blockade of the North & Baltic seas. The only way Germany could retaliate was by a submarine blockade, and unfortunately, that inevitably meant sinking US ships.


44 posted on 04/01/2008 5:36:14 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

That would be an interesting film on Hartman, there are a number of WWII aces that would make good movies.

For a truly amazing tale they could make one on Joachim Marseille (start of the desert).

Adolf Galland would be interesting as he led the Luftwaffe against the USAF.

***Lets see them make a film about Erik Hartmann, then I’ll be impressed. The Baron has been in many other films over the years.***


45 posted on 04/01/2008 5:36:16 PM PDT by msnpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Americans tend to know about the Western Front in WWI, but know nothing about the Eastern Front or the Austria-Italy Front. Due to the movies, people will know a bit about the fight against the Turks via ‘Lawrence of Arabia’ and ‘Gallipoli’.


46 posted on 04/01/2008 5:43:49 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Just laugh at them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

“I wonder who they credit with his kill?”

Ozzie ground troops or a Canadian pilot? There is evidence for both.


47 posted on 04/01/2008 5:44:31 PM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

“In the last few years I’ve become very interested in foreign films on the wars, just to see it from a different perspective.”

Watch BLESSED BY THE FIRE (Illluminados por el Fuego), an Argentinian film about the Falklands War. Surprisingly well done.


48 posted on 04/01/2008 5:46:04 PM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I have to agree, and after having read countless books on him I would say he was as good a family man as he was a military mind.

Most of Rommel's numerous writings and letters have survived, and really tell a story about the man.

Some flaws of his might have been naivety towards Hitler and politics, but he changed in time and learned.

He would have negotiated with the allies if possible, while trying to stop the Soviets.

He wouldn't let his son join the SS, he signed an agreement with Hitler to always be faithful to him.

He did not want to follow strategic orders, similar to Patton.

***Just as there’s nothing wrong with admiring Rommel for his role and place in history. Certainly a great general and tactical mind. He was merely playing for the wrong team.***

49 posted on 04/01/2008 5:46:34 PM PDT by msnpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

One of the most interesting episodes of WW1 (or after) was US forces landing in Russia and kicking commie ass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_Bear_Expedition


50 posted on 04/01/2008 5:49:24 PM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
"(Hartmann) said he always wanted to get close enough that it was impossible to miss."

An undeniably reasonable man.

Apart from the eternal censure of all things German prior to 1946:
Whether heroes or over achievers, we need them.

I don't deny that it is possible to be an over achiever in business, but I feel lots better thinking of Lee, Richthofen, Hartmann, or Giap as heroes than - Donald Trump, H. Ross Perot, Fiyad, or Soros (?)

51 posted on 04/01/2008 6:25:32 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid
Do you imagine however that England would have enforced Canadian neutrality had the USA supported the Central Powers?

Not sure what you mean by this. In 1914 Canada was as British as the land under Buckingham Palace, and Canada was at war with Germany as soon as the British government in London declared war. The Canadian Parliament and government were not consulted, any more than, say, the Massachusetts government was consulted about declaring war on the Japanese on December 8, 1941. And if the U.S. and the U.K. had gone to war against each other during WWI Canada would have been the front line.
52 posted on 04/01/2008 6:31:23 PM PDT by Cheburashka (Liberalism: a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

So did his brother, Lothar, and his nephew, who started with the Condor Legion in Spain, commanded FLIEGERKORPS VIII, commanded the STUKAS at Sedan, and died of a brain tumor in 1944 or 1945.


53 posted on 04/01/2008 7:26:03 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Germany was sinking our ships on the high seas.

By 'our', do you mean British?

The sinking of the Lusitania

How shocking - a ship, carrying the flag of a belligerent, transporting arms, was sunk in an exclusion zone.

54 posted on 04/01/2008 7:26:20 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

Saw a show on the Military History Channel that made a pretty convincing argument he was actually killed by some of the ground troops, specifically named and positioned.


55 posted on 04/01/2008 7:28:22 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville

One of the best, despite less than one hundred kills was Werner Molders, first General of Fighters. Like Boelcke, Molders invented fighter tactics. The finger four formation he developed in Spain is still in use today - by everybody. For great pilots with high numbers, you have Nowotny and Gunther Rall. Some of the night fighters were no sluches, either.


56 posted on 04/01/2008 7:33:13 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
They just bolted on steel deflectors to the backside of the propellers.

There were several solutions, each with advantages and disadvantages. Mounting the gun on the upper wing where it would fire over the prop meant that you couldn't readily clear the inevitable jams. Then there were the pushers, which gave a clear field of fire ahead but were generally unsatisfactory for other reasons.

57 posted on 04/01/2008 7:42:41 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
what the Zimmerman telegram said.

What it said was that the Germans wanted America to remain neutral.

58 posted on 04/01/2008 7:46:18 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

I liked the solution of having a passenger with a shoulder fired machine gun. He had to be real careful not to shoot the wings off or shoot the pilot...or the prop. That would take some guts...and trust.


59 posted on 04/01/2008 7:52:02 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
sopwith camel...pusher.

But not very competitive with the fokker in terms of maneuverability. Or even speed, I think, for that matter.

60 posted on 04/01/2008 7:54:16 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson