Posted on 04/01/2008 12:57:30 PM PDT by blam
Climate Change And Human Hunting Combine To Drive The Woolly Mammoth Extinct
Woolly mammoths were driven to extinction by climate change and human impacts. (Credit: Mauricio Anton)
ScienceDaily (Apr. 1, 2008) Does the human species have mammoth blood on its hands" Scientists have long debated the relative importance of hunting by our ancestors and change in global climate in consigning the mammoth to the history books. A new paper uses climate models and fossil distribution to establish that the woolly mammoth went extinct primarily because of loss of habitat due to changes in temperature, while human hunting acted as the final straw.
It has been particularly difficult to untangle these two potential causes of extinction, as climate change and increased human hunting are linked. When the climate in mammoth territory started to become too warm for the furry beast, it allowed humans--who couldn't handle the lower, mammoth-friendly temperatures--to move into the area.
Therefore, the mammoth faced the heat and predation pressure from hunting in the same regions at approximately the same times, making it difficult to test the importance of the two factors independently. It had also been argued that, as the mammoth had survived many temperature fluctuations previous to those that coincided with its demise, it was only human hunting that was a substantially different condition that could have caused the extinction of the species.
Work by David Nogues-Bravo and colleagues has ended the debate, by using mathematical modelling to separate the two factors. They predicted climate and species distribution at different times in mammoth history--126,000, 42,000, 30,000, 21,000, and 6,000 years ago--considering temperature and rainfall simulations alongside the age and locations of fossils. The results show that the mammoth suffered a catastrophic loss of habitat, with the species 6,000 years ago relegated to 10% of the habitat available to it 42,000 years ago (when the glaciers were at their biggest).
In fact, things were much worse for the mammoth 126,000 years ago when globally high temperatures restricted its habitat even more than at 6,000 years ago. At both of these times, the climate-related habitat loss would have forced the species to the brink of extinction. The nail in the mammoth's coffin 6,000 years ago was that, during the later extinction crisis, the mammoth also faced evolutionarily modern humans. Nogues-Bravo et al. estimate that, for an optimistic estimate of mammoth numbers 6000 years ago, humans would only have had to kill one mammoth each every three years to push the species to extinction. If they are pessimistic about mammoth-climate survival, that figure reaches one mammoth per human every 200 years.
Thus, it seems that, in the case of the mammoth, it was the climate that forced the species to the point of extinction, and it was mankind that gave the woolly beast the last shove into oblivion.
Journal reference: Nogués-Bravo D, Rodríguez J, Hortal J, Batra P, Araújo MB (2008) Climate change, humans, and the extinction of the woolly mammoth. PLoS Biol 6(4): e79. doi:10. 1371/journal.pbio.0060079
Adapted from materials provided by PLoS Biology, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
It is a well known fact that SUV’s and Mammoths compete for the same resources. SUV’s cannot coexist with Mammoths and SUV’s won the fight for survival, hence we still have SUV’s today.
:-)
Nope. SUV's chased the wooly mammoths out of their natural habitat, and they froze to death in Siberia. Oddly enough, with global warming, there are now more SUV's in Siberia than ever before.
Obviously, these scientists mathematical models make it “impossible” for the events in this book to have caused the extinctions. Or, perhaps they should also run mathematical models on the probability of one of the trillion objects in the Oort cloud being bumped into an earth intersecting orbit over time. Of course, Clovis was first, because almost nobody bothered to dig any lower, and if they did and found something they were afraid of being ridiculed by the scientists with the difinitive answers. Ah, where are the inquiring minds when we need them.
:’)
Oh but contraire mon ami, the science has only just now been "settled":
Work by David Nogues-Bravo and colleagues has ended the debate...
So it would seem all those enormous piles of mastodon, wooly mammoth, etc bones scattered around various parts of the world are there because, well, maybe they, by the millions, took a wrong turn somewhere, say, around mid-continent. Early Man then finished 'em off.
How do I apply for my grant???
The Mystery Of Mammoth Tusks With Iron Fillings
Alaska Report News | 3-5-2008 | Ned Rozell
Posted on 03/08/2008 2:03:28 PM PST by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1982619/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.