I disagree. Obama was being groomed for a presidential run since before his DNC "One America" speech in 2004. The people grooming him know exactly what he stands for. He's the more dangerous candidate.
You are correct. We get the candidates that the puppeteers want us to have. Ultimately it is a question of how quickly our society moves toward self-destruction, not a question of whether we travel that path or some other.
One World Government cannot come until the national sovereignty of the most powerful nation on earth is so weak that we beg the U.N. to save us.
I will disagree again by stating that Shrillary is the more disguised Marxist.
And both are part of the Rules for Radicals modus operandi disguising their true intent.
But other than that, the Clinton Mob Machine is ready to step in and do by far the greater damage than any other Obamination.
How that escapes some, I’m completely at a loss.
Which begs the question...since liberalism is a suicidal mental illness, can cognitive dissonance by those who have already voted for the hater-in-chief, allow them to vote for him again in November?
A point well taken.
When you get right down to it, when it comes to Marxists, the DNC can't lose between Hussein Osama and Hillary Robem Klinton.
yitbos