Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin
Pretty much any ammunition can be fired from a handgun. Think T/C Encore and Contender pistols.

Think Marlin Lever actions in .44 mag or .357, 9 mm carbines and thompsons (.45), not to mention .22 LR.

How can they even pretend to say what type of firearm it is for?

50 posted on 03/20/2008 1:16:59 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
Exactly. What a farce.

It does bring to mind my youth and the salesman at the hardware store asking what I was buying .22 ammo for. I asked him what difference did it make? He stated if I had said a revolver or pistol he wasn't allowed to sell it to me.

Stupid laws, I'd say it never changes but that would be wrong. It always seems to get worse.

51 posted on 03/20/2008 1:43:15 AM PDT by SiVisPacemParaBellum (Peace through superior firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe
T/C barrels are available in pistol and rifle lengths, thus encompassing a broad range of ammo as "handgun" ammo.
63 posted on 03/20/2008 7:07:44 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: All

By Debbie O’Hara
April 27, 2004
NewsWithViews.com

We are led to believe that gun control laws are for the benefit of the common people, but what are the real results of gun control? There are those like government educators and the main stream media who would have us believe that ordinary citizens would be safer if they were not allowed to own guns. They would have us believe that a government monopoly on force would make our nation’s people more safe and secure. But is gun control really the necessary tool we need to create a less violent society? Would gun control allow us to better live our lives without fear of being victimized by violent criminals? Are everyday citizens really made safer when the ability to defend themselves and their families from human predators is against the law?

A look at history will show us that gun control does not benefit ordinary citizens. In fact it makes them far more likely to fall victim to violent crime. After a thorough investigation of the history of gun control, any logical-thinking person can only come to one conclusion - gun control advocates are either ignorant or they are evil.

The only people empowered by gun control laws are governments and criminals. And unfortunately sometimes one is the other. What happens when a rogue government takes control of a nation? History’s worst serial killers have been governments that turned predator against segments of their own populations. The inability of innocent victims to defend themselves against their own governments cost the lives of over 170 million of the world’s peoples in the 20th century alone.

In February 1915 a secret plan was made to eliminate Turkey’s Armenian population. It was not difficult for the nation’s new government to set these plans in motion because there were already gun control laws on the books requiring people to register their guns. With this ready information it was a simple task for the authorities to make house to house searches confiscating the weapons of the country’s Armenian Christian minority. Homes were ransacked and people were tortured in order to take their arms. On June 26, 1915 the final part of the plan was put into motion. The government announced that all Armenians would be sent to remote camps. Armed guards rounded them up; most were women, children, the elderly and the handicapped. They were led over rough terrain and into the deserts where many dropped dead from heat and exhaustion. Fewer than 1 in 10 survived the march, only to be butchered in the end by their captors. The total count of the annihilated was 1,500,000 or three-fourths of the Armenian population of Turkey.

In the early 1930’s while the rest of the world was being brainwashed into believing that the Soviet Union was a worker’s paradise, in reality millions were being starved to death by their own government. Wanting to confiscate the grain from Ukraine to pay for industrial expansion, Stalin required that the farmers give up their land and move onto collective farms. Because of ten years of gun control laws, the farmers had no way to defend themselves when they were required to give up their land to the government. Millions of the most prosperous farmers were either sent to forced labor camps or were shot outright. With granaries full, some estimates show Stalin starved as many as 10 million people.

By 1935 the Nationalist government of China forbade the Chinese people to own firearms. This certainly didn’t make the Chinese people safer when from 1942-44 four million people died from starvation when the government confiscated their crops. Another four million were tortured and murdered when they didn’t want to join the military or were “uncooperative” soldiers. In 1937 hundreds of thousands of the women and children of Nanking were left defenseless against Japanese invaders because of gun control laws forbidding them to defend themselves. They were raped, buried alive, burned alive and forced to watch as their own organs were cut out of them. The worst was yet to come in 1949 when the Communist takeover brought about the murder of another 35 million Chinese. Some historians put the death toll by the Communists as high as 100 million. We can believe Chairman Mao when he told us that guns are the ultimate source of all political power.

Article posted in its entirety is from this link:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ohara/debbie22.htm


66 posted on 03/20/2008 7:51:15 AM PDT by Califreak (Hangin' with Hunter-under the bus "Dread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson