Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB
MrB said: "Obviously, given her viewpoint, she was using this as a scare tactic."

I don't think it was a tactic. I think she is genuinely scared that machine guns are to be protected. Liberals know what they want but they very often also know what the rules say.

For example, Hillary wouldn't want Florida and Michigan to count for the Democrat nomination if Obama had won the votes. She knows full well what the rules were. She just wants the rules to be ignored so that she can have what she wants.

The same is true of Ginsberg. She knows what she wants but she also understands that the rules, at least as they are unfolding, are not going to let her have it. The challenge for Roberts will be to convince her that she can side with "individual right" and "strict scrutiny" and yet those nasty, icky machine guns (that nobody needs except police sargeants in L.A.) won't necessarily be protected.

85 posted on 03/19/2008 4:06:15 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

You’ve described libs perfectly -

rules be damned, I want my feel-good outcome!


91 posted on 03/20/2008 5:42:14 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson