To: Domandred
Did I just hear Clement state that machineguns are more valid under Miller than handguns?????
42 posted on
03/18/2008 9:54:53 AM PDT by
BCR #226
(The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: BCR #226
To: BCR #226
I heard the same thing. I wanted to rewind and relisten to be sure, but I’m on live stream instead of Tivo so I can’t :(
45 posted on
03/18/2008 9:56:01 AM PDT by
Domandred
(McCain's 'R' is a typo that has never been corrected)
To: BCR #226
Did I just hear Clement state that machineguns are more valid under Miller than handguns?????
47 posted on
03/18/2008 9:56:41 AM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: BCR #226
Clement says that foremost in the Framers mind was a concern that the Militia would remain a viable option to the standing army. BS! If you go back and read the Framers' writings on the issue, it's clear that they intended that the PEOPLE should have the individual right to keep and bear arms, both for personal defense and for keeping the federal government in line, through the threat of armed revolt.
54 posted on
03/18/2008 9:59:38 AM PDT by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: BCR #226
Did I just hear Clement state that machineguns are more valid under Miller than handguns????? Under that ruling, they most certainly are.
260 posted on
03/18/2008 11:12:58 AM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson