Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ExSoldier
FWIW (since it's my 10th anniversary at FR today)...
Here's what I believe (in a nutshell):

o The right to K&B arms is personal
o It is for the purpose of protecting my self and my family from any threat
o The right can not be infringed in any way - and that right is guaranteed by the Constitution and natural law
o I may K&B any weapon that would normally be issued individually to a contemporary soldier
o I will exercise my right - dispite what the current law might say, because my right is not granted by law, it is unalienable - indeed, it is God-given.

342 posted on 03/18/2008 12:37:44 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: kinsman redeemer

Happy 10th, may you post in interesting times. ;)


344 posted on 03/18/2008 12:41:26 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

To: kinsman redeemer
“o I may K&B any weapon that would normally be issued individually to a contemporary soldier”

Lets extend that: soldier, sailor, airman, or marine.

Which would mean you could have an F-16, or F-15, but not an F-111, for example. (but not all of either of the first two, since some variations are two-seaters, and cannot be flown safely with out the second body.)

I don't see, however, why a group of citizens could not possess and use a crew-served weapon, though. Up to and including a B-52 or 688-class sub, for examples.

400 posted on 03/18/2008 2:40:01 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson