Keep RUSHing the Vote! Operation Chaos Continues

www.rushlimbaugh.com ^ | March 14, 2008 | Rush Limbaugh

[lentulusgracchus]

These "too-rapid immigrants from an alien culture" need to be educated as to which party is for abortion and always has been.

I don't share your sanguine hopes for McCain as a campaigner, but I agree that this is a strong issue in GOP hands as they address the Mexican-American constituency.

They also need to be honest and quit catering on immigration, but McCain's a known quantity on that issue and will continue to turn the conservative base off with it.

This is not going to be a good election. For conservatives, it's going to be all D and no O.

[Slump Tester]

I’m a lucky guy. My other half gets me a 24/7 subscription every year for Christmas, so I get the podcasts. I listen to them the next day at work on my MP3 player. While I’m laid off, I use Audacity to record the entire streaming show in realtime. That way I get all the funny music and parody stuff. I chop out the good songs as MP3s to email. I just leave it in ram and go back and listen to it in the evening.

[Yosemitest]

Sounds like a great plan.
I'm envious.

[Grampa Dave]

“And what’s so disgusting is
that most Republicans don’t know that
the RATs have been this evil ... this long.”

This is my wife’s and many of her Republican female relatives toughest pill to swallow about the rats, “They are truly evil!”

[Behind Liberal Lines]

At Post 79 Yosemitest wrote...And besides, do you really want McCain?

Oh, so, NOW the truth comes out...you WANT the Hildebeast elected.

For shame, sir, for shame.

[Yosemitest]

Show her this.

Isaiah 32     Read This Chapter

GEN -> Study Notes on 32:6
JFB -> Commentary on 32:6
MHC-COM -> Commentary on 32:6
MHC-CON -> Commentary on 32:6
WES -> Notes on 32:6
NTB -> Church; Hypocrisy; Malice; Poor; Speaking; Wicked (People)
TTT -> Hypocrites
TSK -> Entry for 32:6


Isaiah 32:1-8

Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness,

and princes shall rule in judgment.

And a man shall be as an hiding place from the wind,

and a covert from the tempest;
as rivers of water in a dry place,
as the shadow of a great ^F159 rock in a weary land.

And the eyes of them that see shall not be dim,

and the ears of them that hear shall hearken.

The heart also of the rash ^F160 shall understand knowledge,

and the tongue of the stammerers shall be ready to speak plainly.

The vile person shall be no more called liberal,

nor the churl said to be bountiful.

For the vile person will speak villany,

and his heart will work iniquity,
to practise hypocrisy,
and to utter error against the LORD,
to make empty the soul of the hungry,
and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.

The instruments also of the churl are evil:

he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words,
even when the needy ^F161 speaketh right.

But the liberal deviseth liberal things;

and by liberal things shall he stand. ^F162

---

FOOTNOTES:
F159: great: Heb. heavy
F160: rash: Heb. hasty
F161: the needy...: or, he speaketh against the poor in judgment
F162: stand: or, be established

 

The King James Version (Authorized)

[Yosemitest]

Not necessarily, I just don't want McCain.

Just maybe someone will see an opportunity and become a third party real choice.

[Sans-Culotte]

Do you think blacks as a whole will vote for her if she gets the nomination when their messiah has more votes AND delegates? Hell no. they'll be pissed as hell at the rat party for being crooked, and for the whole crooked concept of super delegates. They'll either not vote or cross over. There's even whites in the rat party who are getting mad at her.

I can already hear Rev. Wright's sermon: "Hillary did to Barack what Bill Clinton did to Monica Lewinsky! Can I git an 'amen'? Can I git a 'God damn America!'?".

[latina4dubya]

Do you think blacks as a whole will vote for her if she gets the nomination when their messiah has more votes AND delegates? Hell no. they'll be pissed as hell at the rat party for being crooked, and for the whole crooked concept of super delegates. They'll either not vote or cross over. There's even whites in the rat party who are getting mad at her.

crossover? thanks for the big laugh! yes--they will vote for her... they have nowhere else to go... you act as if liberals vote on principle... they absolutely DO NOT... if this is part of Rush's plan, he has miscalculated...

[SAJ]

‘’No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public.’’ — H. L. Mencken

[Slump Tester]

"This is not going to be a good election.

You're right there. I guess that's why my patience is so short with the folks who are too short sighted to appreciate the shear genius of what Rush has helped happen.

The folks who brought us affirmative action are getting screwed by it. We're seeing a total disintegration of the rat party, and it's just getting starting. We haven't seen anything yet!

[Yosemitest]

More on the affirmative action screwing...

Campaign Crawlers
Reverse Discrimination
By George Neumayr
Published 3/12/2008 12:08:36 AM

Left-wing paternalists regard themselves as architects of racial progress, guarding and guiding blacks along the path of success -- a role in which they assume to stand forever at the head of the march.
But what happens when blacks overtake their enlightened white helpers?
All hell breaks loose and the mask of progress drops to reveal the stricken faces of the white avant-garde.

Geraldine Ferraro's remarks confirm that beneath left-wing paternalism lurks considerable racism.

"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,"
she said to the Daily Breeze.
"He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

Since liberalism is not based upon natural justice but willfulness, it never fails to devour its supposed beneficiaries. Ferraro's condescension captures the tone of paternalistic liberalism perfectly.

Its "victims" should know their place and plot their ascent according to the progressive charts set up by the white liberal establishment.

We'll let you know, Barack, when it is your time to win
-- that's been the tacit theme of the Clinton campaign all along.


Such is the generosity of Lady Bountiful she'll even let him serve as her apprentice in the VP chair for eight years.

But chaos has erupted and the plantation progressives don't know what to do, except to blurt out pent-up racial resentments. Then, the victims, whom they spent the last few decades training in hair-trigger racial sensitivity, turn on them in righteous fury, detecting nuances of racism in everything

from Andrew Cuomo's description of Obama's press conferences as "shuck and jive" events
to Bill Clinton's belittling Jesse Jackson comparison to Ferraro's sniffing at his "luck."

IF, AS FERRARO SAYS, the country is "caught up in the concept" of embracing an unqualified black president, that's because she and her friends propagandized Americans in that notion a long time ago.
Ferraro's whining is the grousing of a propagandist whose student has surpassed her.

Obama can throw in the faces of left-wing paternalists

all their most cherished claims,
starting with the idea, advanced by Sandra Day O'Connor among others,
that in America's suffering sweepstakes
black males enjoy pride of place over white women.
Who should get into Michigan's law school first?
A black male? Or a white woman?
Well, for the next 25 years or so, spitballed O'Connor, let's give it to the black applicant.
Isn't it a little late for Ferraro to be complaining about reverse discrimination?

Hillary's definition of "experience" presupposes a tenet of conservatism, that excellence and merit trump all other considerations.
But that's not the definition of experience she normally endorses and for the eight years her husband was in office she treated it as de facto evidence of racism.
Equality by any which way is more important than experience, their policies assumed.
Where has the Clintons' commitment to a White House that "looked like America" gone?

Under left-wing paternalism until now, race alone conferred important experience on a person

-- an argument that Obama has not made
but could make
to silence his progressive overlords.

Who cares, he could say to them, about thin resumes in the age of affirmative action and egalitarianism?

If people are voting for Obama

because it allows them to place a halo of goodness over their [own] heads,
that too derives from the propaganda of paternalistic liberalism.
Ferraro's own entrance into national politics soared
then sunk upon such stupidity.
Walter Mondale was testing the enlightenment of the American people
by placing her on his ticket
and in those cold and reactionary Reagan years
the people failed his test.

The radical chic of which Tom Wolfe wrote has caught up with the paternalistic left, producing new fodder for farce.

As they held Park Avenue parties for black activists and bankrolled their candidacies to safe and obscure posts,
they could appear progressive while remaining safely in control.
But the role of following blacks rather than leading them is a little too discombobulating for them to handle.
And so they are reduced to grumbling like racists at the "luck" of a black candidate winning yet another state in the South.
George Neumayr is editor of Catholic World Report and press critic for California Political Review.

[Slump Tester]

Great read! That should be a separate post all by itself.

[Yosemitest]

Check out this Reverse Discrimination.

[The Ghost of Rudy McRomney]

“Hillary Clinton will not run for senator of NY.”-Rush Limbaugh

“Hillary Clinton won’t be elected senator of NY.”-Rush Limbaugh

“I doubt if Hillary Clinton can win re-election.”-Rush Limbaugh

“It’s highly doubtful Hillary Clinton will even run for president.”-Rush Limbaugh

“Hillary Clinton cannot possibly win the presidency.”-Rush Limbaugh

[The Ghost of Rudy McRomney]

“Plus, as ignored by many here,
her negatives are so high they will be virtually impossible to overcome.”

---

Been following them at all since 2000?

Yeah, that’s what Rush said about her(them) getting elected senator and then re-elected. See my previous post. That worked out real well, didn’t it? Limbaugh has a TERRIBLE record against them ever since their emergence on the national scene.. The ONLY time this couple ever lost an election was for AG of Arkansas. Not ONLY are they 100% corrupt, and have a free pass from the media, Not ONLY do they have the machine (Arkansas Mafia) in place-they are the most powerful political couple since the Roosevelts. Underestimate them at your peril. They’ve had this planned since the nineties, and if you ask me-it’s worked out pretty damned good for being cococted for that long. Yeah-I guess those high Clinton negatives are why she’d have been coronated now if it wren’t for Obama coming out of nowhere. He was the ONE thing they didn’t forsee. The ONLY thing. And now a group of ‘conservative’ talk show hosts may have helped them get over that hurdle. Please spare me any talk of how I fail to recognize the ‘sheer political genius’ of this ‘strategy’. She’s probably a lesbian, or at minimum a switch-hitter. It doesn’t matter to their party or their voters. He was impeached for perjury. “It was only about sex.” He’s a serial rapist and molester. She’s the enabler. Women still love both of them. Lovers of Bill are legion, and they want him back for a third term. They don’t even live together, and haven’t for some time. NO ONE in the media (including ‘conservative’ radio hosts) will ever mention this. Not one word of Huma the Puma. NONE OF THIS HAS MATTERED, and won’t. They are ONCE AGAIN within striking distance of the White House. Conservative talk radio has been OWNED by the Clintons, and looks like it always will be.They’ve never been able to thwart them to date.

[clintonh8r]

Whatever. She's actually becoming more palatable, the more we learn about Barack Hussein Obama. So, my plan is to keep chaos alive. I'll stick with Rush Limbaugh over some anonymous web posters. But thanks for playing.

[The Ghost of Rudy McRomney]

You may not think it so funny come November. We shall see.

[Yosemitest]

Go to the chalk board and write "Ronald Reagan" a thousand times.

McCain just won't cut it. He sells out conservatives every time. Remember 1994?

It's better for a vile Democrat to take control in 2008 and have a conservative backlash in 2010 and 2012, and have the Republicans stonewalling the Democrats at every turn,

than have the McCain-i-acs in charge, and the republicans trying to support that backstabber.

[The Ghost of Rudy McRomney]

Dear God....I cannot BELIEVE the number of FReepers who actually WANT the Clintons in the White House again!! Most disconcerting.