Well, that is the crux of the argument. I believe that it was written under the early date scenario verses the late date (your) scenario. Written under the early date, it makes perfect sense with what unfolded in AD70. Under late date, it doesn’t. Under early date, the time texts make sense under late date it doesn’t.
I really don’t want another tired argument about this stuff, but if we must then....go ahead.
Trouble is there is zero historical witness for the early date theory. nada. There is historical witness for the 95 date under the reign of Domitian. I’ll take the word of the people 1800 years closer in time.