It’s pretty horrifying. http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:-gfLatRwHh8J:www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/B192601.DOC+B192601&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
I hope that works.
Now, I think the parents (if the above is all true) should be drawn and quartered, and the kids should be put in foster care most likely, but this ruling by the judge on homeschooling *must* be overturned. As others on this thread have stated, for decades California homeschoolers have abided by the law, there have been court cases to settle this issue. Now one judge is saying that parents are not qualified educators. Make no mistake; when he says “qualified” he means “teachers’ license.”
“Now one judge is saying that parents are not qualified educators. Make no mistake; when he says ‘qualified’ he means ‘teachers’ license.’”
And if that is what they, the appeals court justices, mean (and it's not very clear that it is what they mean), then that's in contradiction to California law, which requires someone “capable of teaching” for someone running a private school, contrasted against “certified teacher” if one uses one or more private tutors.
sitetest