Skip to comments.
Skeleton Could Hold Secret To Stonehenge
Salisbury Journal ^
| 2-5-2008
Posted on 03/05/2008 7:02:05 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
03/05/2008 7:02:05 PM PST
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
03/05/2008 7:02:37 PM PST
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
How, did he have his MP3 player on record?
3
posted on
03/05/2008 7:04:57 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: blam
In before the Spinal Tap references.
4
posted on
03/05/2008 7:05:31 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(11+7+15=3 Heismans)
To: org.whodat
5
posted on
03/05/2008 7:08:18 PM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
To: blam
"...sites regularly witnessed the violent death of individual humans..."The same could be said of Philadelphia and New Orleans. Maybe Stonehenge was the location of a failed welfare state.
6
posted on
03/05/2008 7:12:55 PM PST
by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911)
To: blam
“could hold the secret to Stonehenge’s mysterious past and show the site to be an arena of gladiatorial combat”
That’s cool. Forgive the testosterone, but I always thought the “druids prayer circle thing” was lame. (Not that prayer is lame, but praying to trees/stones is...)
7
posted on
03/05/2008 7:16:40 PM PST
by
rjp2005
(Lord have mercy on us)
To: blam
"Dennis Price's idea that there was a sentinel or guardian of Stonehenge, who could only be replaced through combat to the death, conjures up a harsh image of life more than 4,000 years ago, but it also has a certain romantic quality to it."Must be a guy thing to want to kill a person so you can stand guard over some rocks.
8
posted on
03/05/2008 7:18:30 PM PST
by
Spunky
(You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
To: rjp2005
"That’s cool. Forgive the testosterone, but I always thought the “druids prayer circle thing” was lame" I don't know much about the druids, and maybe they even did some sacrificing, but the same kind of guys that who worships trees doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who is into rocks. Especially since it takes big strong guys to move THOSE rocks at Stonehenge. Druids:the First Tree Huggers?
9
posted on
03/05/2008 8:02:39 PM PST
by
Beowulf9
To: blam
Stonehenge: Where Atlantis Died
(1972)
A novel by
Harry Harrison and Leon E Stover
by
Harry Harrison
This rousing adventure story set in the Europe of 1473 B. C.
Above all sets out to entertain.
But it also has a rather more serious purpose -
to expound another theory about the reasons for
the building of the fascinating stone circles.
10
posted on
03/05/2008 8:11:32 PM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(McCain, and or Huckabee will send a self-abused stomped elephant to the DRNC.)
To: blam
11
posted on
03/05/2008 8:22:03 PM PST
by
Old Sarge
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: Old Sarge
12
posted on
03/05/2008 8:37:37 PM PST
by
shineon
To: blam
This is curious; however Roman gladiatorial contests started two thousand years after this guy died. Gladiator fights are expensive (there must be a need) and assume large audience, both of which Rome had. There is no reason to believe that back in 2,300 BC Stonehenge area hosted more than a handful of people, and so it could not afford gladiators, and would have noone to see the fights. I'm unsure if they could afford food back then either.
The professor reads way too much from a dead body. The man could be simply killed in a skirmish and buried near a sacred site (in a graveyard.)
His theory of ritual combat also holds no water. You can't do ritual combat by sneaking behind an unsuspecting man and sending an arrow into his back; it's plain murder, not a ritual. Besides, death from multiple arrows would suggest a combat situation, against multiple archers. Further invalidating the prof's original theory, no sane gladiator will ever go against an archer, let alone several; he'd be a pin cushion before he reaches them.
but it also has a certain romantic quality to it
Yes, that's the reason for all those theories. A fairly tale is always more pleasing than a real, sad story of that time.
13
posted on
03/05/2008 8:48:59 PM PST
by
Greysard
To: blam
It seems remarkably unlikely. The headline, I mean.
14
posted on
03/05/2008 9:14:21 PM PST
by
JasonC
To: blam
You can have the key when you pry it from his cold, skeletal fingers...
15
posted on
03/05/2008 9:33:18 PM PST
by
tracer
To: blam
You can have the key when you pry it from his cold, skeletal fingers...
16
posted on
03/05/2008 9:33:46 PM PST
by
tracer
To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
17
posted on
03/05/2008 10:41:46 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
To: SunkenCiv
He could've been in the wrong place at the wrong time when the temple guards had target practice.
18
posted on
03/06/2008 10:22:23 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: blam
Sacrificed for blasphemy?
19
posted on
03/06/2008 10:23:03 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: Greysard
Besides, death from multiple arrows would suggest a combat situation, against multiple archers. Maybe it was a really brutal version of "Red Rover".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson