Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs.Z

I think he probably is too. If one thinks Hillary would do more damage to the country than Obama, then Rush is wrong. I think the potential is there for Obama, lacking Hillary’s intransigent negatives, to do much more harm. And his race would prevent many in Congress, who’d be willing to confront the unlikable Hillary, from standing against him.


114 posted on 03/05/2008 5:23:27 AM PST by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: GAgal

Obama’s connections to radical Islam scare the heck out of me. And I don’t think he would be a pushover in the general as many seem to think. This is not an election, it is American Idol folks.


128 posted on 03/05/2008 5:32:48 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Scrape the bottom, vote for Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: GAgal

Exactly


138 posted on 03/05/2008 5:39:20 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: GAgal; Mrs.Z
I think the potential is there for Obama, lacking Hillary’s intransigent negatives, to do much more harm.

I agree. Let's do process by elimination:

If McLaim is prez, then all of his screwups will be blamed on the Republican Party and it will be harder to rebound in 2012.

If Obama is prez, he'll be untouchable.

If Shrillary is president, she'll be an easy target. And from this Hillary-Obama battle, many many Democrats have seen the light and realize that Republicans have been right all along about Hill-Billy.

Maharushi is right again.

182 posted on 03/05/2008 6:39:25 AM PST by American in Singapore (Bill Clinton: The Human Stain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson