Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

My husband says this is the case. He is an engineer. He says there is no evidence that the design will really work.


45 posted on 03/01/2008 8:36:45 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: nyconse

I did answer my own question after several dozen more searches. The Scarebus did fly tests. http://www.northropgrumman.com/kc45/


54 posted on 03/01/2008 8:49:24 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: nyconse
My neighbor is a civil aviation buff having traveled frequently on both US and European aircraft and told me a couple of thing I didn’t know. He was on a new Airbus and said he could feel it shaking the whole way, something he’s never felt in an American plane. He said it was slight, but noticeable.

Now for the “dirty secret” of Airbus. Their planes get nearly the same or better fuel consumption as their American counterparts. That is only if it’s a long haul. The Airbus 3 series planes get great fuel economy while at cruising altitude but are gas hogs getting to that altitude. They don’t do well with short trips. A NY to Chicago run would put them in a hole money wise. They need at a trip of at least 1000 miles to break even.

70 posted on 03/01/2008 9:03:44 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson