Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress in turmoil over Air Force tanker decision
Reuters ^ | Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:50pm EST | Kevin Drawbaugh

Posted on 02/29/2008 7:13:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Air Force decision awarding a $35 billion aircraft contract to a team including the European parent of Airbus landed like a bomb in Congress on Friday, drawing howls of protest from lawmakers aligned with the loser, America's Boeing Co.

The Congressional delegation from the Seattle area said they were "outraged." Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt vowed to seek a review of the decision "at the highest levels of the Pentagon and Congress" in hopes of reversing it.

Boeing has big facilities in both Seattle and Wichita, which stood to gain from the long-term project to build up to 179 aerial refueling tankers. Although Boeing was favored to win the contract, the Air Force awarded it to a partnership between Northrop Grumman and Europe's EADS.

Conventional wisdom was running so strongly against Northrop-EADS in some corners of Capitol Hill that Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's office issued a statement late on Friday declaring Boeing the winner. It was swiftly retracted.

Lawmakers from Alabama, where Northrop and EADS plan to do some tanker work, were effusive in praising the Air Force.

"I thought all along that the Northrop Grumman-EADS proposal was the best," Sen. Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican, told reporters. He said the contract would bring nearly 7,000 jobs to the state.

On the disappointment of Chicago-based Boeing's allies, Shelby said he understood. "If Boeing had won this contract ... I would have been concerned about it."

As for Tiahrt's vow to seek a review, Shelby said, "The Pentagon and the Air Force have made their decision and I think it was for the right reasons and I'll stand by that."

The decision was sure to result in a debate, with a formal protest also possible, said defense consultant Jim McAleese.

The tanker deal will give EADS a huge boost in the U.S. defense market, making it the second biggest foreign supplier behind Britain's BAE Systems, analysts said.

"We are so very excited about having the opportunity to help the Air Force acquire the most modern and capable refueling tanker -- a tanker assembled in America -- by Americans," said Alabama Republican Rep. Jo Bonner.

Bonner represents Mobile, Alabama, where assembly work on the aircraft will be done, although it will largely be constructed in France at facilities of EADS' unit Airbus.

Airbus, with large facilities in Toulouse, is Boeing's arch-rival in the global commercial airliner business.

Wichita's Rep. Tiahrt said, "I am deeply troubled by the Air Force's decision to award the KC-X tanker to a French company that has never built a tanker in its history.

"We should have an American tanker built by an American company with American workers. I cannot believe we would create French jobs in place of Kansas jobs."

Tiahrt said he will seek to have the decision reviewed by both the Pentagon and Congress. "At the end of this laborious process, I hope the Air Force reverses its decision."

Washington Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell, both Democrats, along with six other lawmakers from the state said in a joint statement: "We are outraged that this decision taps European Airbus and its foreign workers to provide a tanker to our American military.

"We will be asking tough questions about the decision to outsource this contract. We look forward to hearing the Air Force's justification."

(Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa, editing by Richard Chang)



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: 110th; aerospace; airbus; aviation; boeing; defensecontractors; defensespending; dod; northropgrumman; tanker; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last
To: RayChuang88

What if they need more medium wide bodies in the near future? They just got authorization to fly to LHR. An order for 767-400’s could get filled a lot faster than for the 787-8 or 787-9. Also, they just announced a new 40 seat lie flat business class seat configuration from Thompson Solutions for their 767-400’s. Isn’t the earliest delivery date now for a 787 in the 2013-14 range?


161 posted on 03/01/2008 11:10:40 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Georgia is certainly a right to work state. It didn’t save the garment industry. Texas is one of the few states to benefit from NAFTA because they are a border state. However, something, needs to be done about manufacturing because of the national security implications. A country incapable of manufacturing its own weapons from start to finish can not be considered secure and will very likely not remain free for long. Also, we can not have states hurting like Ohio, Michigan and New York-it breeds instability and will lead to new liberal perhaps even socialist programs.

As for the union thing, GM is now paying new hires $14.00 per hour-no health care and no one gets retirement anymore. I think that is all that needs to be said.


162 posted on 03/02/2008 12:49:55 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

This thing is DOA. Watch.


163 posted on 03/02/2008 12:47:23 PM PST by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

“What next? Build our Aircraft Carriers in Europe too?”

No France already proved they can’t build one of those.


164 posted on 03/02/2008 8:40:41 PM PST by JSteff ( This election is about the 4 or 5 Supreme Court Justices who will retire . Vote Accordingly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
You don't have the Euro socialists build your military hardware.

When the communists take power in France you wont be getting any parts.

And the ones you do get will cost 10 times as much.

Been there done that.

165 posted on 03/02/2008 10:57:36 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson