Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/29/2008 3:45:27 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

I’ll take door number three, Alex.


2 posted on 02/29/2008 4:29:22 AM PST by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I think they’re hoping that when they break up (as they inevitably will) it will be a smaller legal mess if they’re not married and bound by all the state laws that affect property division, alimony, and other considerations. Probably their lawyers and accountants told them to stay unmarried, whether that was good advice or not.


3 posted on 02/29/2008 4:48:59 AM PST by ottbmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

......fictional Murphy Brown .....

Avery Brown’s a bastard


4 posted on 02/29/2008 4:52:56 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
What I fail to understand is how it is that couples in long-running relationships, especially those couples with children such as Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell, Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins, Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis -- couples who give every indication of growing old together -- decide not to make it legal.

Maybe history has told them that there is nothing that eradicates a womans sex drive faster than wedding cake.

7 posted on 02/29/2008 10:36:48 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Maybe, just maybe, what other people do is their business, and nobody else's.
12 posted on 02/29/2008 2:04:38 PM PST by Fiona MacKnight (... in beautiful Buckinghamshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Or have they managed to convince themselves that, without the vows and the rings and the toaster ovens, they’re proving that they’re staying together because they choose to, and not just because they don’t want to risk ever finding themselves on a first-name basis with a gaggle of divorce lawyers?

How To Know if Your Common-Law Marriage Is Recognized
From Sheri & Bob Stritof,
Your Guide to Marriage.

Common-law marriage is not as common as many people believe. Living together does not mean you have a common-law marriage. There are strict requirements that have to be met for common-law marriages to be considered valid. Additionally, only a few states in the United States recognize common-law marriages.

Difficulty: Average
Time Required: varies

Here's How:
Ascertain if the state/country you are living in recognizes common-law marriages. Only a few states plus the District of Columbia recognize common-law marriages. Currently, common-law marriages are recognized by: Alabama, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Washington, D.C.

Generally, there are four requirements for a valid common-law marriage. Just living together isn't enough to validate a common-law marriage.

Requirement One:
You must live together.

Requirement Two:
You must present yourselves to others as a married couple. Some ways of doing this are by using the same last name, referring to one another as husband or wife, and filing a joint tax return.

Requirement Three:
Although the time frame is not defined, you have to be together for a significant period of time.

Requirement Four:
You must intend to be married.

In the U.S., the agreement by every state to recognize as valid a common-law marriage that was recognized in another state has been challenged by many states creating state laws not recognizing same sex marriages valid in other locales. It is best to consult an attorney to make sure your common-law marriage is recognized in the state where you are currently residing.

Note:
The Social Security Administration will only recognize your common-law marriage if the state where you reside recognizes your common-law marriage.

To make sure that you would be eligible for survivor benefits, you need to go to a SSA office and fill out forms, provide statements from two blood relatives, and provide supporting evidence of your common-law relationship.

Your Federal Income Tax, Publication 17:
"Considered married. "You are considered married for the whole year if on the last day of your tax year you and your spouse meet any one of the following tests ... 2. You are living together in a common law marriage that is recognized in the state where you now live or in the state where the common law marriage began." page 20

Tips:
These states have restrictions and only recognize common-law marriages performed/created by a certain date: Georgia, January 1, 1997

Idaho, January 1, 1996

Ohio, October 10, 1991

Oklahoma, November 1, 1998. Whether the Oklahoma law on this will be upheld is still unknown
More on Oklahoma Common-Law Marriage.

Pennsylvania, January 1, 2005.

New Hampshire only recognizes common-law marriages for probate purposes.

http://marriage.about.com/cs/commonlaw/ht/commonlaw.htm

13 posted on 02/29/2008 3:42:35 PM PST by Libloather (February is Liberal Awareness Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson