Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aft_lizard
I just looked and I guess they used Be-10/Be-9 dating, which doesnt make sense ince it has a shorter life than the time period used. But I am no expert in this sort of dating.

See the article I linked to in post #25.

Radiometric dating works to many multiples of the half-life. For example, radiocarbon dating works back to nine or ten half-lives. I assume it is the same for the radioisotope used here.

28 posted on 02/28/2008 6:53:34 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

I quickly misread it earlier, I thought it said it was accurate to 1.5 million years, not that its half-life was just 1.5 million. No morning coffee effect yet, soon though soon.


29 posted on 02/28/2008 7:01:22 AM PST by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson