Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoldierDad

“I would be in support of this weapon not being available for civilian purchase.”

Unfortunately you haven’t read the Bill of Rights. Theres no description needed for the type of arms the people can own.

You are the fodder that anti-gunners feed on. Once 50 cal. rifles are banned then it will be 458 cal, then 45 cal., the 38 and so on. Don’t delude yourself that anything given to anti-gunners will satisfy them except a total civilian gun ban.Watch California for the future of our gun rights.


189 posted on 02/25/2008 11:38:42 AM PST by tonysamm ('")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: tonysamm

Allow me to restate my position. I advocate the ownership of firearms by people who will use them responsibly and respectfully. I do not advocate gun ownership for people convicted of a violent criminal act.

My original comment was poorly thought out, and I’ll admit to that.


196 posted on 02/25/2008 11:53:55 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson