Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tonysamm

Allow me to restate my position. I advocate the ownership of firearms by people who will use them responsibly and respectfully. I do not advocate gun ownership for people convicted of a violent criminal act.

My original comment was poorly thought out, and I’ll admit to that.


196 posted on 02/25/2008 11:53:55 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: SoldierDad
I advocate the ownership of firearms by people who will use them responsibly and respectfully.

If by this, you mean law abiding citizens (I have a problem with "civilians" somehow being a separate class.) I withdraw my prior criticism.

198 posted on 02/25/2008 11:57:33 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad

That I agree with whole-heartedly...


201 posted on 02/25/2008 11:59:12 AM PST by Little Ray (So its McCain or Huckabee? Pass me the bloody KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad
My original comment was poorly thought out, and I’ll admit to that.

The problem is you use EXACTLY the same language that ever gun grabbing socialist organization out there uses. Right alone with their garbage statements like 'common sense gun laws'.

And I have heard that same language from other people that are somewhat conservative but don't lift a finger on gun issues. It is infuriating because it indicates buying into the premise that guns have to have a 'legitimate civilian purpose'. The point of the second amendment and the supreme court ruling in the 30's (not the 1700's) was that the real criteria is military use. The whole point of guns being a check on government tyranny is that the cops SHOULD fear that guns that are in civilan hands because those are what keeps them from abusing the populace. Liberals would love it if the only legal guns were so small they would bounce off the armored suits that all cops would be give. Because in that world they would be free to have total tyrannical power over the population while still tipping their hat to the constitution and mouthing garbage about 'common sense' and 'legitimate civilian use'.
241 posted on 02/25/2008 12:46:02 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad

Can you list the laws that have effectively stopped criminals and the criminally insane or even just the garden variety insane person from obtaining a weapon when they wanted one to inflict harm on another person?

Law abiding (re-read that if necessary) citizens obey the law and criminals do not. So who does such a law target?


263 posted on 02/25/2008 1:09:51 PM PST by Harvey105
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad
My original comment was poorly thought out, and I’ll admit to that.

Sorry if your flame suit got singed. Didn't you learn anything from Zumbo? We natives are a bit skittish nowadays. But, we're finally learning to bite back. :)
282 posted on 02/25/2008 1:50:10 PM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson