[[Want to know why?]]
It’s very simple- they get fed up with, and can’t contend with, posters who refute their assumption driven declarations with cold hard science. They present their ‘evidence’ for Macroevolution, and their assertions get exposed as slight of hand misdirections and exposed as MICROEvolution, to hwich the scientists have no reasonable or valid rebuttles.
No, it’s more like the reason scientists don’t publish studies in tabloids.
Keep in mind that the world of science is pretty demanding and neither polemics nor apologetics get very far.
This is a religion thread, and if posters had the faith they claim, there would be no need for arguing with science.
Quite simply, if science appears to contradict one’s interpretation of one’s religion, the better approach is to seek more understanding or accept the apparent contradictions. Trying to challenge cosmology, geology, chemistry, physics and biology and promulgating half truths and sometimes blatant untruths does no honor to any self-respecting religion.