No, it’s more like the reason scientists don’t publish studies in tabloids.
Keep in mind that the world of science is pretty demanding and neither polemics nor apologetics get very far.
This is a religion thread, and if posters had the faith they claim, there would be no need for arguing with science.
Quite simply, if science appears to contradict one’s interpretation of one’s religion, the better approach is to seek more understanding or accept the apparent contradictions. Trying to challenge cosmology, geology, chemistry, physics and biology and promulgating half truths and sometimes blatant untruths does no honor to any self-respecting religion.
[[This is a religion thread, and if posters had the faith they claim, there would be no need for arguing with science.]]
We’re not arguing for arguments sake- we’re presenting refuting science in most htreads on this site- Misinformation is being shovelled into our kids minds at schools- so your assertion is false- there IS a need to present the facts.
[[Quite simply, if science appears to contradict one’s interpretation of one’s religion, the better approach is to seek more understanding or accept the apparent contradictions]]
Science in no way contradicts our religion- it is ONLY when the apologists for Macroevolution begin asserting issues BEYOND the science that it becomes necessary for the strict facts to be presented which contradict the assertions of Macroevolution.
[[Trying to challenge cosmology, geology, chemistry, physics and biology and promulgating half truths and sometimes blatant untruths does no honor to any self-respecting religion]]
Lol- so Christians should just roll over- and not question false assumptions? No- hte reason the scientists left this forum was precisely for hte reasons I listed. Noone is presenting ‘blatant untruths’ in defense of strict science/ID- The FACTS speak for themselves and show the issue of Macroevolution in it’s TRUE light- a biological impossibi9lity.