True, I'm among the last of a vanishing breed around these parts. Most other scientists have either been banned or left in disgust.
Want to know why? Just read this thread. But I guess its better than most such threads; we haven't yet been compared to Hitler and the nazis, and I don't recall seeing someone condemning scientists to hell. But the thread is still young!
Nor have Christians been compared to muslims or Hitler, nor called cretards or IDiots, .... yet.
The evos have no high horse to preach from. They’re guilty of the same kind of behavior you’re condemning in creationists.
I suppose taht as a moderator over at DC, you keep a tight rein on that kind of unseemly behavior and don’t allow it to happen. Right? Right?
[[Want to know why?]]
It’s very simple- they get fed up with, and can’t contend with, posters who refute their assumption driven declarations with cold hard science. They present their ‘evidence’ for Macroevolution, and their assertions get exposed as slight of hand misdirections and exposed as MICROEvolution, to hwich the scientists have no reasonable or valid rebuttles.
[[Most other scientists have either been banned or left in disgust.
Want to know why?]]
Not to mention that they’d rather start their own websites where they are surrounded by likeminded individuals who won’t take a critical look at hte REAL facts and who won’t constantly refute hteir ideas with facts, and folks hwo won’t point out the problems with the ‘evidences’, and hwo will all band together and attack anyone who dares expose the lies and half-truths of Macroevolution. Can’t blame htem though- it’s never easy taking a critical look at hte science and going against hte grain by refusing to blindly accept a hypothesis that has no scientific support- people don’t like hteir pet hypothesis’ being challenged.