Gee, if the media is wanting to smear a candidate, this is even better than the lame “anonymous” sources they cite for the McCain story.
I bet the Slimes won’t take this story on, even if Sinclair passes this thing.
Frankly, there are plenty of reasons to vote against Obama...I don’t need Sinclair to convince me.
BUMP!!
(( ping ))
He just might check out. I give him 50-50.
There is ALREADY more evidence here, than what the NY Slimes had against McCain!
Good, they gave him a drug test along with the polygraph.
If this story is going to be believable, Sinclair needs to find that limo driver to at least corroborate that Obama was in the same vehicle with him. Or if the driver said “no comment” then even that would tell us a good bit.
The lie detector test might make his story somewhat more believable, but not to any great degree.
Regardless, I doubt many people are going to change their votes over this issue. Obama’s been under pretty much nonstop scrutiny the last couple of years, so it’s hard to imagine that he would be able to keep using drugs and not have it public.
My guess is that Blumenthal or Ickes found this guy.
We all know that they are not evidence in court and someone with experience and training has a good shot to beat the machine. That having said, if he passes it, I suspect that some people are going to be doing some investigating.
It has not been reported in the NY TIMES that Peter Paul took a polygraph and passed regarding his discussion with Hillary about Bill working for his company. Hillary turned in a false declaration to the court. http://youtube.com/watch?v=e-3-M4L_1HA
Check his chin for ball-bruises.
I recall there was a story that Hillary had something on Obama. He challenged her and pretty much said, “bring it on”. I just wonder if this or something related is what Hillary didn’t want to tell, or at least didn’t want to get her own little paws dirty exposing.
Suggestions of impropriety are made by anonymous sources about McCain and he immediately addresses it in a press conference. All this comes up and Obama and the media are totally silent. Is Obama just above it all or is there another reason? Remember the singer who was formerly gay but now is anti-gay that caused the big stir earlier in the campaign? Perhaps he and Obama share the same struggle? Of course I am just having fun with this, because it is funny. We shall see, or not.
Okay, I’m 1st:
It was Bush’s fault!
Waiting breathlessly. No doubt we’re about to be provided with the “blue dress.”
He had gay sex and smoked crack...
...isn’t that redundant?
The trouble with all this fuss, is that “lie detector” polygraphs yield unreliable results. They are easy to fake as well.
I can’t believe we’re posting “news” from a porn king.