Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

The trouble with all this fuss, is that “lie detector” polygraphs yield unreliable results. They are easy to fake as well.


77 posted on 02/22/2008 9:19:13 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rudder
The trouble with all this fuss, is that “lie detector” polygraphs yield unreliable results. They are easy to fake as well.

Polygraphs do not detect lies. They detect physiological stress, and are based on the premise that lying triggers those stress responses. They are useless if:

- the subject believes what he's saying, either because he's delusional or because he's managed to convince himself that the lie is true;

- the subject is not stressed by lying; or

- the subject has learned to control or mask those physiological responses.

There's a reason polygraphs have never been admissible in court. They might help as an investigative lead, but they don't prove anything. This is a publicity stunt, and no matter the outcome of the test, we still have a conveniently-timed story by one person with no corroboration.

107 posted on 02/22/2008 9:42:17 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson