Posted on 02/22/2008 8:25:38 PM PST by freespirited
Due to security concerns, we had to move the Larry Sinclair Polygraph up a few days. We conducted it in secret today and the picture to the left is from from one of the two arduous polygraphs Sinclair underwent today.
The process took four grueling hours, testing Sinclair's claims of sex and drug use separately and also including a drug screening to ensure that Sinclair didn't enlist any chemical assistance.
The results are being confirmed by a second expert and we'll have conclusive word, along with video of the whole thing, Monday or Tuesday. Check back then for more, including video the tests and, of course, the results.
I think that a story like this could be devastating to the Obama camp, if proven. The public would cringe at the thought of a new, more twisted (if that’s possible) replay of Clinton/Lewinsky scenario with Obama and some coked-up loser bobbing for balls in the Oval Office.
There’s not positive way to spin that.
this is the funniest thread i’ve ever seen
i cant stop laughing at some of these comments
“Is Obama just above it all or is there another reason?”
its journalistic suicide if this guy turns out to be a liar, or if it can never be proven....... the journalist or media outlet that breaks this first is either going to become legendary or infamous for all eternity. thats why no one is touching this.
I assume any decent polygraph examiner will probe for the possibility of such experience and training.
I doubt Larry has any, but you are right, certainly it should be ruled out.
I listened to him on the radio for an hour. He sounds a lot saner than people here imagine.
That’s right. Obama was blown by Bill Murry.
Okay, I’m 1st:
It was Bush’s fault!
Waiting breathlessly. No doubt we’re about to be provided with the “blue dress.”
He had gay sex and smoked crack...
...isn’t that redundant?
“homosexual sex is repulsive to most Americans. “
And is very much frowned upon in the black community. It may damage some of his support, hopefully anyway.
I heard the same interview you did. Not what I expected at all. The guy was articulate and quick with his answers even answering questions he really couldn’t have prepared for completely. He seemed credible, at least more credible than I would have ever imagined he could seem.
He is either telling the truth or insane. I don’t see how he could just be a liar looking for his 15 minutes of fame, doesn’t fit. If he is lying, he is quite insane, because, whether it’s true or not, I believe he believes it.
Let’s assume he’s telling the truth. Obama got a bj from a dude and smoked crack in 1999. How many people who are inclined to vote for Obama will actually change their vote as a result?
I really can’t see very many people at all changing their votes- it’s just not the kind of thing that decides votes, especially with a Democratic candidate. Obama has admitted using coke before, the only difference is this story moves the date up significantly and changes the form of cocaine to crack. As far as accepting a bj from a dude, I just don’t see that costing a Democrat many votes at all.
Too bad......
FR took a vote and look stupid won.
Really! It’s not like anyone is accusing him of rape.
I absolutely agree with you, This guy ought to have his say.
I have been in the unfortunate situation of trying to prove fraud on a company employee, and he had enough people cover for him that I never even got to take a polygraph test that I offered, and he is still ripping that company off every day. Made a fool out of me, but the fact still is that he was/is still guilty and has got away with it. Let this guy present his case, and corroborating evidence and THEN judge him one way or the other
The trouble with all this fuss, is that “lie detector” polygraphs yield unreliable results. They are easy to fake as well.
Some people said the same of Monica.
Don’t limit your thinking... It would be great to get them to switch, but it’s also good to get them to simply stay away from the polls. They may not switch but I’ll bet one hell of a lot of them won’t expend any energy to help him become the guy they have to look at on TV for the next four years while their mind constantly goes back to the imagined image of Obama playing "sword swallower" with that little troll. And, that’s a good thing.
How inconrtovertably true. And it would also have inconrtovertably true if he had said it was Karl Rove.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.