Posted on 02/22/2008 8:25:38 PM PST by freespirited
Due to security concerns, we had to move the Larry Sinclair Polygraph up a few days. We conducted it in secret today and the picture to the left is from from one of the two arduous polygraphs Sinclair underwent today.
The process took four grueling hours, testing Sinclair's claims of sex and drug use separately and also including a drug screening to ensure that Sinclair didn't enlist any chemical assistance.
The results are being confirmed by a second expert and we'll have conclusive word, along with video of the whole thing, Monday or Tuesday. Check back then for more, including video the tests and, of course, the results.
This is much more credible than the NYT’s slanderous allegations. At least this story has somebody one record making accusations.
And many Clinton supporters will not vote for Obama.
$1 says there is a Fox News Alert when the results are released?
What is wrong with doing some coke and getting a Lewinski a long time ago?
The Clinton’s proved you can rape without consequence.
This is going nowhere.
Yeah he has two I think. I didn’t realize he did either till I saw some ad online.
he talks about the limo driver on this radio interview:
http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_Larry_Sinclair_012308.mp3
Will Michelle do a Hillary on him? Should he hide the ashtrays?
“What is wrong with doing some coke and getting a Lewinski a long time ago?
The Clinton’s proved you can rape without consequence.
This is going nowhere.”
The clintons never ran based on character. obama is running as the man who will “fix the soul of the nation”.
crack heads dont fix souls very well
You’ve spent a lot of time posting in defense of Obama the past few days (not on Sinclair alone), why?
That said, there is at least a named source for this story, putting it several rungs higher on the ladder of credibility than the Times McCain story, where the sources are “anonymous”, meaning, of course, that the Times’ gang of bath-house hacks simply fabricated them out of thin air.
All coked up, maybe he did?
I said the same thing...it would have happened before he took the polygraph test though. If the Clintons were smart, they would have offed him then and the whole thing would have come down on Obama...maybe they have run that play too many times though...lol
The stress observed in a polygraph isn't based on the risk of getting caught. It's based on the fact that for most people, lying inherently causes some stress, often not at the conscious level. It's not tied to consequences.
Parisi said he would get two of the most respected polygraphers in the country. One to administer the test and give his interpretation, one for a second opinion. He can certainly afford to buy any expertise he deems necessary.
(I haven't been following the story, because it is almost laughable. I mean, look at this guy, I have a really hard time believing ANYONE, straight or gay, would be with him. lol)
If you had heard him out on the radio, as some of us have, I suspect you might feel differently. He comes across as intelligent and credible. And while everyone draws conclusions based on appearance when they have no other information, do keep two things in mind. One, the alleged event happened nine years ago. Two, Larry is now a cancer patient.
I heard him on a radio show out of SLC called the Jim Sumpter show.
The host said he would put up a podcast and transcript so you might want to check it out.
Go here:
http://www.jimsumptershow.com/
Click on the secret site tab under his photo.
I am not now, nor have ever been, in Austin, TX. So I ain’t “that” LS.
Phwew!
If it turns out that the allegations are true, Obama is guaranteed the nomination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.