[HappyinAZ]

What a bunch of crap. It’s not about the Party...it’s about the country.
You can either support a Socialist...or you can support a canidate that is conservative 85% of the time.

[claudiustg]

-—You can either support a Socialist...or you can support a canidate that is conservative 85% of the time.-—

No we can do what we want. I intend to vote for whatever right wing fanatic the Constitution Party puts up.

[Ingtar]

or you can support a canidate that is conservative 85% of the time.

When you find me such a candidate to support, let me know. None of the trio fits that bill.

[TomGuy]

you can support a canidate that is conservative 85% of the time.

Okay, he is non-conservative 15% and conservative 85%.

So, is his assault on the First Amentment with CFR in the 85% or 15%?

Is his open borders and amnesty for 12-60 million illegals in the 85% or 15%?

Is his opposition to the initial Bush tax cuts in the 85% or 15%?

Is his threat to jump parties after his 2000 presidential run ended in the 85% or 15%?

Is his outreach to Kerry to be Kerry's VP in 2004 in the 85% or 15%?

Is his statement that he would not appoint an Alito type SCJustice because Alito wears conservatism on his shirt sleeve in the 85% or 15%?
==

It really doesn't matter whether you consider these in the 85% or 15%.

His assault on the First Amendment and his continuous push for amnesty for illegals are two insurmountable deficits. I would not vote for him if he were running for dog catcher of Bug Tussle, Oklahoma. I do not trust what he would do in office.

[LibLieSlayer]

I “may” end up puking and voting for macnasty... but his ACU rating is 65% NOT 85%.

LLS

[KevinB]

... or you can support a canidate that is conservative 85% of the time.

I would happily do so if there were one still in the race.