Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: Democrats Dug In For Retreat
The Washington Post ^ | February 22, 2008 | Charles Krauthammer

Posted on 02/22/2008 2:11:02 AM PST by Puzzleman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Puzzleman

democrats would rather rule in hell than serve America.


41 posted on 02/22/2008 11:46:29 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Well one read it, out of the three I addressed it to, by all indications, though one of the other had avoided me like the plague today. They are in self denial. Most I work with are liberal by training and association. Not exactly the brightest bulbs around to begin with. So be it. Taint their faults, they where just brought up in a liberal environment.


42 posted on 02/24/2008 6:15:23 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter was our best choice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

DUTCH BABY!!!

You can run...But, you can’t hide...


43 posted on 02/24/2008 6:19:44 PM PST by NeverForgetBataan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

The rats apparently never considered a coup. Not against the President but at the Capitol. A company of combined arms could remove the objectional traitors and place them in detainment till they see the light.

They can be replaced


44 posted on 02/24/2008 6:23:39 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman
Are the Democrats so intent on denying George Bush retroactive vindication for a war they insist is his that they would deny their own country a now-achievable victory? Are the Democrats so intent on denying George Bush retroactive vindication for a war they insist is his that they would deny their own country a now-achievable victory?

Damn straight.

According to Harry Reid and the defeat-mongers, it's already lost. Even as it's almost won.

Thank God these people weren't in charge of the Iraq War. Or the Revolutionary War. Or any other war.

45 posted on 02/24/2008 6:27:44 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

What do people mean by victory in Iraq? If by “victory” you mean that Iraq contains absolutely no terrorists, well, then thousands of young American soldiers will be fighting (and dying) in Iraq for decades.
I value young American lives highly, so I’m not sure that squandering them to bring peace to a people so far away (when we have so many problems at home) is worth it.
Of course, if you don’t value young American lives highly, then it’s easy to say that losing thousands more American lives to help so many foreigners so far away is worth it.

Maybe I’m wrong. I mean, how do you assign a value to an American life? If we’re going to sacrifice ten more young American lives, what should we expect in return? A hundred more young American lives? A thousand? It’s not clear what we’re getting back that is worth the thousands of young American lives already lost in Irag.


46 posted on 10/02/2008 8:14:01 PM PDT by saintbrendan (What do people mean by victory in Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson