Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Will Vote for McCain By Daniel Oliver
NRO ^ | 19 February 2008 | Daniel Oliver

Posted on 02/19/2008 4:55:34 PM PST by K-oneTexas

Why I Will Vote for McCain Conservative resolve (mine, not his).

By Daniel Oliver

John McCain is not a conservative, but I will vote for him anyway.

After all, in 1952, conservatives, grumbling that Ohio senator Robert “Mr. Republican” Taft had not been nominated, voted for Eisenhower because he was clearly the better alternative to Adlai Stevenson. And they voted for Ike again over Stevenson in 1956.

In 1971, a Who’s Who of conservatives, including the senior editors of National Review, suspended their support of President Nixon because of both his domestic-policy failures and his tendencies in foreign policy.

In 1972, however, National Review endorsed the reelection of Nixon, describing the Democratic candidate, George McGovern, as “not something with which a grown-up superpower can play.”

Was Eisenhower a conservative? No. Nixon? No. Bush (either one)? No. McCain? No. Republicans, yes — it’s a famously big tent — and with some conservative positions. But having conservative positions is not the same as being a conservative.

What is a conservative? Essentially, someone who is temperamentally suspicious of government. That’s why conservatives argue for limited government, economic freedom, low taxes, and fewer regulations. The bumper-sticker version might be: “If in doubt, keep government out.” That demonstrates a healthy skepticism of both government’s competence (think Katrina clean-up) and its fuzzy benevolence, which generally involves toying with any activity that begins with the letters A through Z, scolding people for their behavior (and, er, persuading them to change it), or redistributing their wealth.

The skeptical view of the redistributionist function of government can be described, with apologies to William Graham Sumner, as A and B deciding how much C should give to D.

The behavior-modification efforts of government can be seen in innumerable campaigns and diktats like anti-smoking and anti-obesity crusades and campaign-financing laws.

A useful rule of thumb is: No one who voted for, or signed, the McCain-Feingold Act can be considered a conservative. Unless he recants and repents.

John McCain also opposed Bush’s tax cuts (though his vote may have been less an anti-tax-cut vote than an intemperate anti-Bush vote — but that is not good either) and he favors global-warming programs that most conservatives think are foolish and harmful (if in doubt, keep government out). And — sigh! — he favors importing prescription drugs from Canada, which is not just economic nonsense of the first order but suggests college-level economic illiteracy.

Nevertheless, McCain is clearly a Republican, with some conservative positions. He has promised to appoint judges who will interpret the law, not make it. He has promised to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. And he has promised to fight government spending, to veto any bill with earmarks, and to roll back entitlement programs—positions that, these days, it is an act of nostalgia to describe as “Republican.”

Meanwhile, Senator Barack Obama has been named the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate by National Journal. Senator Clinton can’t be far behind. Against them, Senator McCain would seem the obvious choice for conservatives. But some of them think a term or two in the political wilderness would be beneficial.

Conservatives have been here before. As National Review said in 1972, “There are those, including some of our colleagues, who believe that four years of McGovern would catalyze a recrudescent conservatism. We disagree that the chance is worth taking. McGovern is the erector set of big-think intellectuals, otherworldly dreamers, and children. Belloc warned that dangerous toys should not be given to little boys.”

Senator McCain might help his cause with conservatives if he stopped calling himself a conservative. He is damaging their brand name. And conservatives should stop, now, demanding that he be a conservative: that is not a condition precedent for being the better choice for president. Conservatives should remember that the fault McCain is not a conservative is partly their own: They have not succeeded in making conservatism the iPod in the marketplace of political philosophies.

To conservatives, John McCain sounds like the Devil. That is his fault, not theirs. He has dissed them and enjoyed it. That is not presidential, and if he does not stop he will not be president. He should make—and is making—amends, and not for his own sake, or for the conservatives’, but for the country’s.

It is time for conservatives to accept reality (accepting reality is another conservative trait); and the reality is (1) John McCain will be the Republican nominee for president and (2) he will make a far better president than the Democratic alternative.

Dangerous toys should not be given to little boys.

Or to little girls.

— Daniel Oliver was chairman of the Federal Trade Commission under President Reagan. He is now a senior director at White House Writers Group and chairman of the board of National Review.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: danieloliver; mccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: calcowgirl

“Carry on selling the snake oil!”

Carry on greasing the skids for Hilda-Bama in the White House. (shuddering at the thought)

They backstabbed our troops on the battlefield.
I will never forget, or ever forgive.

All I have is the vote, I have to try to stop them even if it means McCain.


41 posted on 02/19/2008 6:01:10 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
No one but me cares about my vote.

These types of articles will continue to be posted when people seen anything worth repeating in them. just the same as the 'anti-McCain' articles will continue to be posted for the same reason.
42 posted on 02/19/2008 6:01:25 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: All

Nope ... tired of all the “lesser of two evils” scenarios. Been stuck in it too long. Time to vote my conscience. I’ve accepted the inevitability of a liberal in the POTUS seat (whether with an “R” or a “D” in the title) and am turning my sights on Congress. No ... I won’t vote for McCain.


43 posted on 02/19/2008 6:02:44 PM PST by so_real ("The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

If memory serves, Hillary didn’t even show up for the FISA vote. She was too busy on more important matters.


44 posted on 02/19/2008 6:03:20 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Scarmongering is all they’ve got. Look at what they’re running up the flag pole.

Maybe they should "calm down" and "take a deep breath" and "grow up," huh? ;-)

45 posted on 02/19/2008 6:03:53 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
If we swing the pendulum too far left the military will suffer, ...

That is exactly why McCain will never get my vote. A decision I made pre-2000.

46 posted on 02/19/2008 6:05:43 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Anyone who admits McCain is no conservative has an ounce of credibility, but it misses the point: McCain is not only NOT a conservative; he's a traitor, and an angry, self-righteous, imbalanced traitor at that.

The person whose mind hatched a moratorium on incumbent voting records 60 days before an election can only be called what he is: an enemy of the Bill of Rights, and I don't care who you lump in with him on that.

I don't recall Eisenhower telling honest citizens concerned about a flood of illegal immigration to F themselves.
47 posted on 02/19/2008 6:08:26 PM PST by farmer18th (Conservatives who vote McCain are like abused dogs who keep licking their master's hand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

It’s going to be an interesting year around here up until November. Those who have decided an RP victory trumps anything else are in for a tough ride, as others remind them time and again of what McCain actually is.


48 posted on 02/19/2008 6:08:42 PM PST by DoughtyOne (We've got Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dumb & Tweedle Dumber left. Name them in order. I dare ya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Hey... vote how you want. I respect your right to vote however you please.

I wish others would have equal respect for those who think differently
and wouldn’t throw out nonsense like nuke photos in some scare campaign.


49 posted on 02/19/2008 6:09:00 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Those who have decided an RP victory trumps anything else are in for a tough ride, as others remind them time and again of what McCain actually is.

Nah... I think the Ron Paul supporters have resigned themselves to the fact he won't win. ;-)
(Yeah... I'm kidding, I know ya meant pubbie.)

50 posted on 02/19/2008 6:11:47 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr... ;-)
51 posted on 02/19/2008 6:13:31 PM PST by DoughtyOne (We've got Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dumb & Tweedle Dumber left. Name them in order. I dare ya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

“I wish others would have equal respect for those who think differently
and wouldn’t throw out nonsense like nuke photos in some scare campaign.”

I truly feel that Obama will make that scenario quite possible. Just as Clinton made 9-11 possible.

Now a picture of the WTC in collapse prior to Clintons election to office would have been considered nonsense and a scare campaign of course. Yet....


52 posted on 02/19/2008 6:19:32 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

I read your post... and I don’t agree. The “little ditty” is my way of expressing that disagreement, without being long winded on the tiresome GOP plot to force a RINO down our throats again... by any means available.


53 posted on 02/19/2008 6:36:39 PM PST by RTO (Salve Regina, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Hey, Tiger... Got any 2nd Amendment stuff on McShame? Some dude was asking on another thread last night. I sent him your way.


54 posted on 02/19/2008 6:38:56 PM PST by RTO (Salve Regina, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RTO
Yes, quite a bit. The GOA link is stuffed with further links. I'm throwing in a link about Kemp and Chavez for free. ; )

John McCain, Jack Kemp and Hugo Chavez.

MORE GUN CONTROL: McCAIN-LIEBERMAN FR April '01

Gun Owners of America on McCain's Record.

GUNS AND SCHOOLS: THE POLITICS (McCain tries to grab guns, 1999)

55 posted on 02/19/2008 6:53:03 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Why I Will Vote for McCain, By Daniel Oliver:

Because I am an east-coast pu**y who has never fired a gun in my life.


56 posted on 02/19/2008 6:54:11 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (I wish my old tagline could have defeated even more RINOs than it did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RTO

I don’t know if he came my way or not. He might have visited my homepage but no one ever contacted me. Thanks for the reference. Long live the Constitution, the Republic and conservatism!


57 posted on 02/19/2008 6:54:29 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

LMAO That’s called “speaking truth to pu**ies!”


58 posted on 02/19/2008 6:56:36 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

“and with stalwart conservative in Congress will secure the borders”

If the GOP could not or would not enact real border security when they held all three branches of Government, what do u think McCain can do?

NOTHING!


59 posted on 02/19/2008 6:57:02 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

Thank you for demeaning my opinion. I can see that if I don’t agree with you I must be wrong.


60 posted on 02/19/2008 6:57:07 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson