Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: Admin Moderator
The guy with the video is either deranged, or a Clinton tool- or both. In the spirit of Bones McCoy:
It's dead Jim."
109 posted on
02/17/2008 7:00:17 PM PST by
zadox
To: Admin Moderator
Obama and the YouTube drugs/gay sex video
It certainly is a catchy title for a thread.
To: Admin Moderator
I think the accuser is trying to make money for a set of teeth.
To: Admin Moderator
I prefer to not confuse news with home videos. Actual news stories about scandals/rumors are okay. But youtube movies? Not interested. I don’t visit that website and don’t want it to visit me.
118 posted on
02/17/2008 7:19:42 PM PST by
G.Love
( Romney '12)
To: Admin Moderator
No more of the video, please. Leave it to the National Enquirer et al to dig up more on this. It’s pretty sordid as is until or if it is ever substantiated. If they don’t touch it, FR has taken the high road. If they do, and something turns up, we’ll take it from there. Maybe some Freepers out there can start the truth engine on this one and beat all the rest to it. If true, it is beyond newsworthy, it will be the demise of his candidacy.
120 posted on
02/17/2008 7:20:48 PM PST by
Melinda
To: Admin Moderator
I hope Larry Sinclair reads
this.
Cheers!
121 posted on
02/17/2008 7:21:21 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Admin Moderator
Don’t post the video without more evidence.
I agree with many others here. We can’t just go on hearsay from one potentially crazy person.
We are better than the DUmmies and the KOmmies.
To: Admin Moderator
If corroborating evidence (not just polygraph tests, which can lie) appears, then it's worthy of FR for its political impact.
Until something more than a random YouTube video is available, I say pull the threads that link to it.
Discussion threads about the topic are fine.
But we should NOT PROMOTE the video by linking to it, directly or otherwise.
124 posted on
02/17/2008 7:31:11 PM PST by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: Admin Moderator
It has Mafia written all over it, Jim.
127 posted on
02/17/2008 7:36:13 PM PST by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
To: Admin Moderator
I will say that I remember some woman named Kitty Kelly who was on the Today Show a few years back with lurid tales about George W. Bush’s involvement with homosexuals and cocaine use.
This woman’s calendar was filled up with usual suspect MSM program appearances, and her gossip was through-the-grapevine stuff. This Sinclair guy is making first hand unproved accusations so I don’t see how Lauer and the rest of the usual suspects can fail to publicize his story.
To: Admin Moderator
That guy first came out on rense.com which is a banned siteher IRRC. We don’t want that crap here.
To: Admin Moderator
This “story” does not pass the smell test.
Pull them until this shakes out a bit more.
131 posted on
02/17/2008 7:41:00 PM PST by
dfwddr
To: Admin Moderator
If we're going to discuss this topic we should at least ask for more proof. Yeah, check the limo for DNA. Why is it that conservatives always ask for more proof but all it takes is one liberal to make an accusation of a conservative and it has to be defended?
To: Admin Moderator
However, if this guy produces Barak’s blue dress with both guys DNA on it, it’s a whole other ballgame. So to speak.
To: Admin Moderator
Even if the accusations are true, I see it as only helping in the view of homosexual Liberal Democrat voters...
137 posted on
02/17/2008 8:28:43 PM PST by
TheBattman
(LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
To: Admin Moderator
Let’s wait for B J Clinton or Hillary to publicly raise the issue, then we attack them and Obama.
To: Admin Moderator
We sure don’t want to be useful idiots running with fake planted stories so that when real dirt shows up, we won’t have any credibility.
139 posted on
02/17/2008 8:32:06 PM PST by
fso301
To: Admin Moderator
World Net Daily ran the story today. They are considered a reputable source by most.
140 posted on
02/17/2008 8:33:23 PM PST by
no dems
(Global Warming advocates have the IQ of a can of Spam.)
To: Admin Moderator
How quickly we forget
If memory serves me 8 years ago the media hung onto the "Bush did cocaine" story like rabid pit bulls, even though it was only a rumor ; one in which NOT ONE person came forward to corroborate it.
To those who say no to this story, all I can think is that turnabout is fair play. But no matter, I don't expect the media will be consistent.
141 posted on
02/17/2008 8:47:10 PM PST by
Cubs Fan
(Liberals have the inverse midas touch, everything they get a hold of turns to crap)
To: Admin Moderator
FR has been infiltrated as of late. Some on here actually defend obama. Choose wisely on this topic, you could be playing into their hands.
The left screamed it was all gossip, lying and a right-wing conspiracy, that is until Monica Lewinsky stained blue dress turned up, remember?
Let the accusations on obama remain. His closet supporters here can bug off.
142 posted on
02/17/2008 9:15:14 PM PST by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson