[Cronos]

I gave you a list of reasons from internal evidence in the Scriptures why it is not reasonable to believe that Peter was ever a Bishop in Rome.

No, you didn't. All you said was "Peter was not supposed to preach to Gentiles", completely forgetting that there were Jews in Rome. At no point in the Bible does it say "Peter was not in Rome"

Your only answer to that was "oh, there was a massive conspiracy and everything in history is wrong except what I, John L, say". After you see this proof, then you say, "oh no, that was revisionist and distorted" and then you say that the Bible was revised and distorted as it comes from The Church

[John Leland 1789]

” . . . Bible was revised and distorted as it comes from The Church”

---

This applied to the text-type your “church” organization chiefly uses.

I gave you a list of seven or eight items; an actual list. You just brushed it aside for external histories written by people that need to defend your church’s ecclesiology.