Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ingtar
Seems like you have a problem with reading comprehension. That article proves my point, not yours: Romney didn't take a position on the tax cuts at the time. Did you not even bother to read the first paragraph?

"Governor Mitt Romney refused yesterday to endorse tax cuts at the heart of President Bush’s economic program, but he told members of the state’s congressional delegation during a private meeting he also would not oppose the cuts because he has to maintain “a solid relationship” with the White House."

There is zero evidence that he opposed them.

227 posted on 02/15/2008 9:39:06 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

Read the rest of it. Arguing over a failed and irrelevant candidate is getting us nowhere. You see only what you want to see and I see things that concerned me enough to make me see them through an opposing set of glasses. He has no relevance now or in the future, so I’ll concede this as an uneccessary exercise.


236 posted on 02/15/2008 9:50:54 AM PST by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson