Read the rest of it. Arguing over a failed and irrelevant candidate is getting us nowhere. You see only what you want to see and I see things that concerned me enough to make me see them through an opposing set of glasses. He has no relevance now or in the future, so I’ll concede this as an uneccessary exercise.
I did. There's no evidence, not a shred, in the article that Romney opposed the tax cuts. But maybe I'm blind. Kindly point out the passage that you think proves he opposed them.