Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rurudyne's Daily Global Cooling Watch
Brits at their Best ^ | January 31, 2008 | unattributed

Posted on 02/13/2008 7:53:28 AM PST by Rurudyne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 441-450 next last
To: Rurudyne

How does all of this match with the historical trend? That is, as others have pointed out, the sun goes through 11-year cycles. How does the recent data compare with 11 years ago?


281 posted on 05/23/2008 7:46:07 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Thanks for keeping me posted ...


282 posted on 05/23/2008 7:55:02 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Do you know anything about acidic ocean currents? The Seattle Times had a front page article about the fact that acidic water had been detected off the west coast, and of course it was blamed on green house gases.


283 posted on 05/24/2008 8:58:30 AM PDT by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
Rocky wrote: "How does all of this match with the historical trend? That is, as others have pointed out, the sun goes through 11-year cycles. How does the recent data compare with 11 years ago?"

Here is a chart for measured solar flux values since the late 1950s (when scientist started measuring same as an indicator of solar activity—i.e. how hot it is).

Looking at that chart, it would seem that several years at a solar minimum isn't all that unusual. SC18 dropped below 100 around '52 and SC 19 was back above by '56. SC19 dropped under 100 around '62 and SC 20 (which didn't break 200 at its maximum) was up '68-ish. And so forth.

We look to have been in that state since around '04, so unless things drag out to next year this may not be all that unusual.

Even at a glance, SC23 could be said to have a lot less "under the curve" that either SC21 or 22 before it ... so it's not surprising that we've seen no warming this last decade (or even slight cooling) till last year when things began to be noticed (snow in either Jerusalem and Baghdad can really get folk's attention, never mind in both).

The only real reason to be concerned (about global cooling) comes from theoretical science that allows that there are cycles in solar activity longer than 11 years and on which the shorter cycle is more or less imposed (there is a link to something to that effect back in post #120).

These ideas are based on observations of sunspots (for which we have data going back for several hundred years) among other thing (like evidences for what pre-climate science climate was).
284 posted on 05/24/2008 5:46:21 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Eva

I’m not going to pretend I know much (or even a lot of a little).

It looks like some are blaming it on acid rain from ordinary pollution while others are blaming it on warming because of absorbed gases into the water.

However, I’m a bit doubtful of the latter because warmer waters are actually less able to absorb and retain gases than cooler waters are. Global warming, where the oceans warm too, in and of itself should lead to less acidic water.

In the meantime we have measured slight drops in ocean temps world wide, though I can’t see how the small values measured could do much of anything. In theory though, a cold ocean can hold more gases in solution than a warm one.


285 posted on 05/24/2008 6:00:49 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Maybe the Great Plains—flat, wide and relatively low?


286 posted on 05/24/2008 6:09:34 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

I read somewhere that they were experimenting with pumping excess C02 into the ocean to get rid of it. Could this be the cause?


287 posted on 05/24/2008 6:37:53 PM PDT by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Ohhhhh! I had FORGOTTEN about THAT! Hehe ... well, it’s right up there with wanting to spread coal tar on the ice caps to fight global cooling and fend off a new ice age (an actual ‘70s era idea) if they did.


288 posted on 05/24/2008 7:53:22 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
The Sun's Working Vacation : Day 141 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum


Dated from January 4th, 2008, when someone claimed to see a sunspot they called #10,981.


Saturday Update


Flux Density Values in sfu for 23:00 on 2008:05:24

Julian Day Number : 2454611.447

Carrington Rotation Number : 2070.425

Observed Flux Density : 0068.3

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0070.1


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0063.1


Reference Post #120

289 posted on 05/24/2008 7:54:06 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Great information! Thanks.


290 posted on 05/24/2008 8:14:41 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
The Sun's Working Vacation : Day 142 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum


Dated from January 4th, 2008, when someone claimed to see a sunspot they called #10,981.


Sunday Update


Flux Density Values in sfu for 23:00 on 2008:05:25

Julian Day Number : 2454612.447

Carrington Rotation Number : 2070.461

Observed Flux Density : 0068.5

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0070.3


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0063.3


Reference Post #120

291 posted on 05/26/2008 8:01:18 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
The Sun's Working Vacation : Day 143 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum


Dated from January 4th, 2008, when someone claimed to see a sunspot they called #10,981.


Monday Update


Flux Density Values in sfu for 20:00 on 2008:05:26

Julian Day Number : 2454613.322

Carrington Rotation Number : 2070.493

Observed Flux Density : 0068.0

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0069.8


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0062.8


Reference Post #120

292 posted on 05/26/2008 2:57:36 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
The Sun's Working Vacation : Day 144 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum


Dated from January 4th, 2008, when someone claimed to see a sunspot they called #10,981.


Tuesday Update


Flux Density Values in sfu for 23:00 on 2008:05:27

Julian Day Number : 2454614.447

Carrington Rotation Number : 2070.535

Observed Flux Density : 0067.1

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0068.9


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0062.0


Reference Post #120

293 posted on 05/27/2008 6:56:34 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
]The Sun's Working Vacation : Day 145 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum


Dated from January 4th, 2008, when someone claimed to see a sunspot they called #10,981.


Wednesday Update


Flux Density Values in sfu for 23:00 on 2008:05:28

Julian Day Number : 2454615.447

Carrington Rotation Number : 2070.571

Observed Flux Density : 0067.4

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0069.3


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0062.3


Reference Post #120

294 posted on 05/28/2008 8:55:08 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
I don't know about the Sun
... but I was goofing off yesterday ...
Days 146 AND 147 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum



Dated from January 4th, 2008, when someone claimed to see a sunspot they called #10,981.


—Ping—


If any one wants to be added to (or removed from) this list please contact me.



Thursday's Numbers


Flux Density Values in sfu for 23:00 on 2008:05:29

Julian Day Number : 2454616.447

Carrington Rotation Number : 2070.608

Observed Flux Density : 0067.1

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0068.9


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0062.0


Friday's Numbers


Flux Density Values in sfu for 17:00 on 2008:05:30

Julian Day Number : 2454617.197

Carrington Rotation Number : 2070.635

Observed Flux Density : 0066.8

Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0068.6


URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0061.8




Red is Observed Flux Density. Blue is Adjusted for 1 A.U.

Reference Post #120


295 posted on 05/30/2008 11:30:40 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; AnAmericanMother; arthurus; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; BraveMan; Carry_Okie; chpmass; cob201; ...

I ... sorta forgot the “ping” aspect of that last ... erm ... “ping”.

My Bad.


296 posted on 05/30/2008 11:42:22 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

What is the sound of no hand clapping?


297 posted on 05/30/2008 11:44:41 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
(grizzled cowboy gazing narrowly at the Sun)

"It's quiet up there.

TOO quiet."

298 posted on 05/30/2008 12:01:03 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Great ... now I’ve got the “Sounds of Silence” rumbling through my head and it’ll probably be there all day long.

Well, at least it’s a song I like....


299 posted on 05/30/2008 12:04:48 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

The sun is talking to itself and now you’re doing it. It must be contagious. heh


300 posted on 05/30/2008 12:55:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 441-450 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson