Skip to comments.
Clinton v. Obama: The Lawsuit (Will Florida Supreme Court decide who is the Dem Nominee?)
WSJ ^
| 2/11
| Ted Olson
Posted on 02/11/2008 12:21:44 AM PST by bshomoic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
02/11/2008 12:21:46 AM PST
by
bshomoic
To: bshomoic
Remember...
“This is the most important election of our lifetime.”
- H. Clinton
To: bshomoic
Maybe, but with Jeb Bush having appointed a couple of the Florida Supreme Court justices there would at least be a dissent pointing out how ridiculous the court looks this time.
3
posted on
02/11/2008 12:41:16 AM PST
by
Moral Hazard
(This election mess is Iowa's fault. From 2012 on make them vote last (or not at all).)
To: bshomoic
Clinton is no longer nearly as popular with Democrats as Obama. Most of the Democrats are going to be really mad, if she’s nominated. She would be more easily defeated in the general election, though.
4
posted on
02/11/2008 12:42:43 AM PST
by
familyop
(Stay away from my precious bodily fluids, bro!)
To: bshomoic
Stupid premise ... the super delegates will determine the dem nominee.
5
posted on
02/11/2008 12:51:27 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: familyop
"That Obama is sooooo hot right now. Let's vote for him."
6
posted on
02/11/2008 12:59:35 AM PST
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
That’s good...really good! LOL!
7
posted on
02/11/2008 1:14:28 AM PST
by
familyop
(Don't go messin' with my precious bodily fluids, bro!)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
IMO, it's time to contribute some historical ugly to the contemporary ugly. Democrats, especially feminist leaders among them, are shrewd racists.
Constitutional Argument:
Speech After Being Convicted Of Voting
In The 1872 Presidential Election
by Susan B. Anthony
Excerpt:
An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household - which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.
Susan B. Anthony went on to travel and speak with the Democrat racist, George Train. She refused to advocate against lynchings.
8
posted on
02/11/2008 1:33:28 AM PST
by
familyop
(Don't go messin' with my precious bodily fluids, bro!)
To: Moral Hazard
I’m glad your mentioned Jeb Bush. I believe Jeb Bush may be John McCain’s VP come this November.
9
posted on
02/11/2008 1:35:52 AM PST
by
SatinDoll
(Desperately seeking a conservative candidate.)
To: bshomoic
If this becomes the scene it will turn off so many Obamma voters that Mrs. Clinton will get her clock cleaned in the general.
She is disliked and distrusted by a near majority of the populace at this point. She will really appear terribly if she goes through this kind of crap to win the nomination
Course she couldn’t be lower in my esteem regardless of what she may do in the near future.
She is a liar, thief, enabler of a serial sexual pervert and imho has had many folks who offed who tried to go against her sorry butt.
10
posted on
02/11/2008 3:01:25 AM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: SatinDoll
Im glad your mentioned Jeb Bush. I believe Jeb Bush may be John McCains VP come this November. it would be great to see another Bush in the White House, but I don't think that's going to happen.
And it's good that you don't see Jeb as pres. He's proven impotent in the face of the Euthenasia machine.
And, florida did what it wanted to do (and what it always did) the entire time he was governor: bought and sold souls.
11
posted on
02/11/2008 3:09:27 AM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(anyone can be a soldier in peacetime.)
To: bshomoic
Florida: saw it off and cut it away.
12
posted on
02/11/2008 3:13:03 AM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(anyone can be a soldier in peacetime.)
To: bshomoic
I actually think there is a stronger case to be made for upholding the DNC rule against the early Florida primary. The DNC, like the RNC, is a private organization like the Odd Fellows or, in this case, the Liar's Club. That is why the two parties fought, and won, in court when the State of California presumed to pass a law requiring open primaries in that state. The constitutional right of free association does not permit the state to decide what a club's rules are.
Consequently SCOTUS could, and IMHO would, overturn the SCoFLaws if they tried to change the rules of the national Democratic Party without any need to reference Bush v. Gore. Probably unanimously.
But Olsen's point about how Hillary's attempt to change the DNC's rules post hoc, after having fussed and fumed about the Electoral College back in '00, is a delicious irony.
13
posted on
02/11/2008 4:08:25 AM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The Democratic Party is only a front for the political establishment in America - Big Journalism.)
To: bshomoic
Electing Hillary is much more important than rules.
To: SatinDoll
Doubt it. Too much Bush fatigue. Similar to Clinton fatigue.
15
posted on
02/11/2008 4:55:34 AM PST
by
tips up
To: MHGinTN
The super delegates in NJ are already preparing to jump the HMS Hillary.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1967626/posts
16
posted on
02/11/2008 4:59:01 AM PST
by
mware
(Americans in arm chairs doing the work of the media.)
To: mware
17
posted on
02/11/2008 4:59:24 AM PST
by
mware
(Americans in arm chairs doing the work of the media.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
You are correct. By the DNC rules there were no primaries.
It logically and legally follows that if there was no primary, there was no winner and there are no delegates.
18
posted on
02/11/2008 5:05:27 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . "You can't be that way"......... Clint)
To: bshomoic
Should they begin tallying up chads again. Just love the Dem Party. Can’t even stick to their own rules. They just have to keep changing the goal post to suit themselves.
19
posted on
02/11/2008 5:06:12 AM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: bshomoic
Should they begin tallying up chads again? Just love the Dem Party. Can’t even stick to their own rules. They just have to keep changing the goal post to suit themselves.
20
posted on
02/11/2008 5:06:56 AM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson