Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton's advisers 'in a state of panic'
telegraph.co.uk ^ | 2/10/2008 | Tim Shipman in Washington and Philip Sherwell in Chicago

Posted on 02/10/2008 7:36:50 AM PST by Red in Blue PA

Hillary Clinton's most senior advisers are in a state of "panic" about her presidential prospects and are plotting to enlist Democrat leaders in Congress to thwart her rival Barack Obama's ambitions.

--

The Clinton camp hopes to stop the Obama bandwagon by winning Texas and Ohio primaries on March 4, after which Mrs Clinton is planning to call on party grandees including Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives and Harry Reid, the party's leader in the Senate, to persuade Mr Obama to stand down.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antichrists; commies; hillary; obama; socialists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-222 next last
To: LadyNavyVet

How many of those voting on the Pubbie ballot were cross-over voters, i.e., Independents, or Dems who knew their delegates would not be assigned at the Dem convention and chose to play with the Pubbies primary? If memory serves me correctly (former FL resident), didn’t voters have to register no later than 30 days prior to the primary?


121 posted on 02/10/2008 9:27:12 AM PST by callisto (CONGRESS.SYS corrupted...Re-boot Washington DC (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

Disagree. Drug use is a résumé enhancer for Democrats.


122 posted on 02/10/2008 9:27:34 AM PST by G.Love ( Romney '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

Thanks, I must have been brain washed by the MSM. I think I heard the turnout numbers at around 60% and the Dems. were ahead then because most had voted early.


123 posted on 02/10/2008 9:28:11 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
He is by far the stronger candidate.

Anyone who believes that has forgotten the death grip of Bill Clinton's eight years in office, 900+ FBI files, and the thuggery of both the Arkansas mob and the NYT.

If Hillary gets the nomination, she's in. And if she's in, she'll control everything because the word "delegate" doesn't exist in her vocabulary, and she will fill Washington with like-minded lesbian gym teachers.

If by some fluke Obama were to win, he'd have Congress checkmating him at every turn.

124 posted on 02/10/2008 9:31:10 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: millerph

IMO we can argue amongst ourselves and vote accordingly throughout the primary process, but once a nominee is settled upon at the convention, we MUST get behind that nominee to mitigate the damage that would be produced by either Dem option. I value my principles, liberties and freedoms left to us by our Founding Fathers and wish to not lose them. Once they’re taken we may never get them back, and that would be to the detriment of our nation.


125 posted on 02/10/2008 9:31:53 AM PST by callisto (CONGRESS.SYS corrupted...Re-boot Washington DC (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: callisto

There’s no way of knowing. I saw one news report that talked about voters reregistering, but more were going from R to D than vice versa. Bad news in a swing state like Florida.

I think McCain won Florida because we have a large voting demographic that gets their news from the MSM, so the only thing they knew about him was that he was war hero.


126 posted on 02/10/2008 9:34:33 AM PST by LadyNavyVet (“I will offer a choice, not an echo.” Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Besides, if it comes out too close, they will just say...”look at florida and michigan, hillary won those, lets give them back their delegates for the purpose of a ‘tie-breaker’”

I think her big problem is that if she doesn’t win outright, which now seems won’t happen, then black voters will be turned off. The only chance she would have to reclaim them would be to take him as her running mate. What kind of deal would have to be made to get him to agree to take the 2nd spot before a convention crisis?


127 posted on 02/10/2008 9:35:39 AM PST by millerph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
If by some fluke Obama were to win, he'd have Congress checkmating him at every turn

I couldn't agree more. His inexperience and far-left pie-in-the-sky ideas mean that he won't be very effective. Hillary knows how to make things happen. He doesn't. She's much more dangerous than he is.

128 posted on 02/10/2008 9:35:59 AM PST by G.Love ( Romney '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

It sends chills down my spine to think of either one of those Commies as President.


129 posted on 02/10/2008 9:36:13 AM PST by Palladin ("Pimp" is a synonym for "Democrat".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

They talked about this but it won’t happen because of the expense.


130 posted on 02/10/2008 9:43:50 AM PST by westmichman ( God said: "They cry 'peace! peace!' but there is no peace. Jeremiah 6:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Have you really given that much thought to your post? The man has ZERO experience and refuses to really state any platform, for starters. So please examine his record before you cast your vote.

That is EXACTLY the point. The Clintons HAVE a record and it certianly is not one to be proud of. Yes sir, they have a record of destroying people.

Obama has showed me he was able to come from nowhere and look where he is now. He has smarts and sincerity. He's a quick learner.

131 posted on 02/10/2008 9:44:15 AM PST by cliff630 (We're here. Why & How?? Great to ponder, isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: G.Love

Any idea where this info about J.C. Watts came from? I’ve been around him enough to think this is non-sense. However, I think he left congress because the party dumped on him. There was a tank or something like that which would have required training in his district. He pushed hard for it, but it was dropped anyway.


132 posted on 02/10/2008 9:47:12 AM PST by millerph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: bannie

....generally speaking Arkancide starts after they get into the White House...


133 posted on 02/10/2008 9:48:10 AM PST by redstateconfidential (If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: callisto

I respect you opinion, but I disagree. I think Hill and Bill and their merry band of unindicted co-conspirators would move back into the White House and continue down the road to socialism without missing a beat.

Obama would be starting from scratch. He doesn’t have any executive experience, even less than Bill and Hill did in 1992 and would have to do a fair amount of reinventing the wheel. I think over four years he would get a lot less done.


134 posted on 02/10/2008 9:49:25 AM PST by LadyNavyVet (“I will offer a choice, not an echo.” Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Hillary Clinton's most senior advisers are in a state of "panic" about her presidential prospects

SUUWWAA-EET!

Twist in that wind "Hill," twist and shout!

135 posted on 02/10/2008 9:50:08 AM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
Suicide. He is by far the stronger candidate. And his capacity to do damage to America is far greater. I'd much rather see a Hillary win in a squeaker than have O'bama win in a landslide - and that is what it is shaping up to be.

I heard a lot of the same exact talk in 1992. Republicans citing Bob Kerrey's comment about how the GOP would open Bill Clinton up like a "warm peanut" and stuff like that.

Given the assumption (one I happen to believe in, mainly because Conservatives are going to sit this election out) that McCain is destined to win the nomination but lose the general election (despite the fact that I will vote for him in the general), I'd rather have Barak and his ideology in the White House than Hillary and her political machine. I was in DC in 1993-on when those ~900 FBI files wound up in the White House basement; the Clintons' used the FBI to destroy a bunch of career civil servants to outsource the White House travel office to Bloodworth-Thomasson; when the Clintons' used the IRS as a political vendetta tool; when the Clintons, who won on doing something about the "worst economy in the last 50 years" started out their Administration with their "gays in the military" social engineering experiments.

I don't like the fact that I'm going to do this, but in casting a primary vote for Barak Obama I really feel like I'm choosing the lesser evil to prevent the greater evil from gaining power.
136 posted on 02/10/2008 9:50:38 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: millerph

If conservatives started saying right now that they all supported McCain 100%, he would have no reason to pursue them. I want to see conservative voters pursued and convinced by McCain so we will not be ignored by him.


137 posted on 02/10/2008 9:50:43 AM PST by westmichman ( God said: "They cry 'peace! peace!' but there is no peace. Jeremiah 6:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

The other side of me thinks Obama would be much harder to beat in November

Obama’s church: www.tucc.org/about.htm
Read the 10 beliefs. If he’s hard to beat with that info out in public, we’re in big trouble!


138 posted on 02/10/2008 9:53:28 AM PST by millerph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: millerph

No, in fact I hadn’t heard any of these things about JC before today. That doesn’t mean they aren’t true, I’m just not that interested in researching them. What his siblings have done has no effect whatsoever on my opinion of him.


139 posted on 02/10/2008 9:53:44 AM PST by G.Love ( Romney '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Tijeras_Slim; Eaker; Allegra
Rumpology, also known as butt reading, is the art of reading the lines, crevices, dimples, and folds of the buttocks

Also the patterns of mold and migratory routes of parasites.

140 posted on 02/10/2008 9:58:18 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson