Skip to comments.
Can McCain Corral Conservatives?
Wall Street Journal ^
| 2/9/08
| NICK TIMIRAOS
Posted on 02/09/2008 5:17:12 PM PST by Winged Hussar
How conservative is Mr. McCain? During his quarter century in Washington, the senator has assembled an 82% rating from the American Conservative Union, placing him 39th among senators in 2006, while drawing a 25% lifetime rating from the liberal American Civil Liberties Union. Hillary Clinton, by contrast, has a 75% ACLU lifetime rating. A scorecard by the antitax Club for Growth, a conservative political-action committee, ranked him 29th among 55 Republican senators in 2006.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; aclu; american; civil; clinton; juanmccain; liberties; mccain; mcstain; obama; ourmexicanoverlords; rino; rinostampede; thelarazacandidate; union; unity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
To: princess leah
Newt is a solid, smart conservative who would be a good VP for MCain. Newt is an opportunist without character and one who has been duped by the environmentalist whackos into believing in global warming.
The only thing "warming" about Newt is the hot air that he always blows in interviews.
61
posted on
02/09/2008 7:14:00 PM PST
by
A2J
(Love Jesus...hate "church.")
To: E. Cartman
Good night! When will these hate McCain posts get over it already. With 707 delegates and more to come for the 1191 total, when will people get a clue? McCain is it.
NOW EVERYBODY GET OFF THEIR HIGH HORSE AND GET A REALITY CHECK!
McCain is trying to appeal to another part of the political spectrum. He still cares about us. We are still loved by him because he knows it was conservatives who stood behind him and Vets like him during the Viet Nam War. He will carry a debt of gratitude to us for it. And, last night in Seattle he showed us the bracelet he wears given to him by one of our own (a conservative) to daily remember a son who died in Iraq for our freedom.
Now McCain is wooing the independent vote. This is a delicate effort. Sort of like a courtship. This is beyond politics 101. It is high tech politics. The independent vote is needed if we are to take out the DemonRATs. This has been a calculated effort going on for a long time. And during that process, we have been calling him Mccinsane for his strategery. However, the huge numbers he has been enjoying have come largely from the independents. These votes will be money in the bank when it comes November.
REMEMBER: A COMMON ENEMY BRINGS PEOPLE CLOSER TOGETHER.
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
63
posted on
02/09/2008 7:28:09 PM PST
by
adc
(Rush '08All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently oppos)
To: jonrick46
He still cares about us. We are still loved by him because he knows it was conservatives who stood behind him and Vets like him during the Viet Nam War. He will carry a debt of gratitude to us for it. Refresh my memory, please: was all this directly BEFORE or AFTER he frothed, red-faced and bulge-eyed, that any/all principled conservatives opposed to his forcibly ramming another 30,000,000+ illegal aliens down our collective gullets, during the shameful Juan's Shamnesty Sweepstakes episode, were all "just a rotten bucn of nativists and bigots"...?
In the immortal words of Jack Nicholson, in As Good As It Gets: "Sell crazy someplace else; we're all stocked up here."
64
posted on
02/09/2008 7:29:44 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("John McCain is to conservatism what Cindy Sheehan is to the Miss Universe Pageant.")
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"bucn" = bunch.
65
posted on
02/09/2008 7:30:40 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("John McCain is to conservatism what Cindy Sheehan is to the Miss Universe Pageant.")
To: princess leah
If McCain picks a great VEEP like say, NEWT GINGRICH, then I believe he can pull in the conservative vote. Newt is a solid, smart conservative who would be a good VP for MCain. If it were 1992 McCain-Gingrich would have been a heck of a ticket, so superior to what the Republicans offered with Bush-Quayle. I would have loved to see Gingrich run circles around that Stockdale guy and Al Gore in the debates.
66
posted on
02/09/2008 7:31:40 PM PST
by
Biblebelter
(I will NEVER EVER vote for McCain or any other current Senator.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I’ll refresh your memory: how many seats in the Senate did Republicans loose because people like you sat on their thumbs and did nothing to help their senator keep his seat in the 2006 elections? This is why Senator McCain, with “frothed, red-faced and bulge-eyed” effort had to get what he could in a Immigration Reform Act. A 51 Republicans, 48 Democrats Senate is not much for a hot headed Freeper to hoot about.
To: jonrick46
because people like you sat on their thumbs and did nothing to help their senator keep his seat in the 2006 elections?You're so obviously full of crap, you practically squeak. Not only did I faithfully cast my ballot for the Republican candidate for senator in '06, I also served as the party precinct captain for my district. Better luck next time, pookums.
This is why Senator McCain, with frothed, red-faced and bulge-eyed effort had to get what he could in a Immigration Reform Act.
Juan McCain "HAD TO" attempt to force-pump an additional 30,000,000+ illegals into this country's tank, did he? He "HAD TO" splutter, obviously teetering on the verge of apoplexy, that all principled conservatives opposing his sweet little quid pro quo deal with Vicente Fox were all just "nativists and bigots," did he?
I call bullcrap. "Splain, Lucy. And show ALL of your work, please.
A 51 Republicans, 48 Democrats Senate is not much for a hot headed Freeper to hoot about.
"Calm down."
68
posted on
02/09/2008 7:48:10 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("John McCain is to conservatism what Cindy Sheehan is to the Miss Universe Pageant.")
To: TommyDale
I haven’t had a chance to vote in the primaries and, as I said, I am likely to vote for Romney or Huckabee. But that probably won’t change the outcome.
Our choice is therefore not Romney vs. Clinton, or Huckabee vs. Clinton, but McCain vs. Clinton. I would rather have a RINO than a left wing collectivist like Clinton (or Obama).
69
posted on
02/09/2008 8:32:11 PM PST
by
Winged Hussar
(http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
To: Winged Hussar
70
posted on
02/09/2008 8:34:27 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
To: COBOL2Java
71
posted on
02/09/2008 8:38:51 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
To: COBOL2Java
Sorry, dude. I thought you were the author of that high font post. Myyyy bad. (shuffling feet)
72
posted on
02/09/2008 8:40:17 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
To: A2J
McCain is not identical to the Democrats. His ADA rating is 10-35%, but Clinton's and Obama's are consistently 95-100%. He does not support gun control (Clinton and Obama do) and he does not support socialized medicine as Clinton does. I do not agree with him on global warming, but Clinton and Obama agree with cap-and-trade and similar garbage, so there they are at best equal. I didn't say to vote for McCain in the remaining primaries. What I am saying is that, if McCain is our nominee, we had better get behind him unless we want Clinton or Obama to name some Supreme Court justices, enact gun control legislation with the aid of Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer, raise taxes, and do everything else they can to wreck our country. Again, look at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120251189813955043.html?mod=special_page_campaign2008_leftbox McCain's "liberal quotient" from the ADA has never gone above 40% (2001) and is usually a lot lower. Clinton's and Obama's have never gone below 95%. 40% is not what I consider desirable, but it's a lot better than 95%, and 95% is what you WILL get if you don't back McCain (again assuming that he is the nominee). Another way of saying it is, if I have to eat a sandwich of rotten meat or something similarly objectionable, I would rather have a single slice of it than a double-decker or club sandwich, and Clinton and Obama are both the supersize version.
73
posted on
02/09/2008 8:55:29 PM PST
by
Winged Hussar
(http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
To: TigersEye
“John McCain Gets Soros Cash”
PUKE! Now I will definitely vote for Romney or Huckabee this April, assuming that either is on the ballot in Pennsylvania.
Furthermore, this would in fact disqualify McCain from getting my vote in the general election if he was not running against someone even worse, which he will be.
Hold your nose when you pull the R lever, as we have had to do ever since Reagan.
74
posted on
02/09/2008 8:59:05 PM PST
by
Winged Hussar
(http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
To: Winged Hussar
I will never vote for McCain. Ever!
75
posted on
02/09/2008 9:23:08 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
To: TommyDale
Didn’t stop you from supporting Bush...
76
posted on
02/09/2008 10:20:14 PM PST
by
Eyes Unclouded
(We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"I also served as the party precinct captain for my district." I am having trouble with the above description which makes me suspect your authenticity. So, were you a District Chairman or a Precinct Committee Officer? I being a District Vice Chairman should know the proper name for both offices. You don't fool me.
To: jonrick46
I am having trouble with the above description which makes me suspect your authenticity. So, were you a District Chairman or a Precinct Committee Officer? I being a District Vice Chairman should know the proper name for both offices. You don't fool me.LOL! Now you're only embarrasssing yourself further, if possible. At the Republican Party Caucus, county chairmen assign and designate separate precinct captains -- what you maladroitly misidentified as "officers," in your desperate haste to bluff your way out of an earlier, cringe-worthy faux pas -- reportable directly to them. All of this is information quickly and easily locatable online, incidentally, by even a very small, uncommonly backwards backwoods child, via Google. Ass.
My, my. You now have a public apology to couth up. Let's see if you've the stuff necessary to cowboy up for the occasion. My money's riding on "not hardly."
78
posted on
02/09/2008 11:29:47 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("John McCain is to conservatism what Cindy Sheehan is to the Miss Universe Pageant.")
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"couth" = cough.
79
posted on
02/09/2008 11:35:24 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("John McCain is to conservatism what Cindy Sheehan is to the Miss Universe Pageant.")
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Precinct Committee Chairs is the correct name; not a Precinct Captain and there was never the term you originally used, which was a "District Precinct Captain." I ask you, why would someone be a Precinct Committee Chair rather than a Precinct Committee Officer?
This is a test.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson