1 posted on
02/09/2008 2:13:05 PM PST by
SandRat
To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.
WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!
2 posted on
02/09/2008 2:13:29 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
With that in mind, he has been particularly active in asking NATO allies to dig deep for more troops for the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.They need to be contained in Afghanistan or we will counter their attacks globally in the future at a greater cost.
The WOT is going well and we need to maintain the wellness.
4 posted on
02/09/2008 2:23:47 PM PST by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: SandRat; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
The articles all seem to miss the point.
The need is not for troops in Afghanistan per se. The need is for troops in the southern provinces such as Kandahar and Helmand where the insurgents are active.
The north has ample troops but some nations have placed caveats on their deployments that keep their soldiers out of the south.
5 posted on
02/09/2008 2:29:20 PM PST by
Clive
To: SandRat
The offensive in the spring was NATOs offensive, he said. There was no Taliban offensive.Aren't the drivebyes saying that we're losing?
6 posted on
02/09/2008 2:32:58 PM PST by
Eagles6
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson