To: Norman Bates
The news just said they’re waiting for the results from the WA state (and I think Nebraska) caucuses - so looks like they’ll be reporting them. From the Dim caucus place I drove by and a couple of other reports, sounds like the Dims had a huge turnout.
To: Seattle Conservative
Maybe the results of what people wrote on the sign-in sheet is what is going to be reported as a candidate "winning" or "losing" the WA caucuses, because I don't see how the "delegates" that were "elected" can be reported as a "result". Some precincts had less delegates "elected" than they were allotted and one had no one show up at all! I wonder how the media are going to report this. The sign-in sheet is completely meaningless. It has nothing whatsoever to do with who was elected to be a delegate and how they are going to vote at the conventions.
This is such a load of CRAP!
Where's that second beer........
113 posted on
02/09/2008 5:09:21 PM PST by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
To: Seattle Conservative; anyone
I heard a blip not certain if I heard right.
Seems the turn out was so huge in Seattle that some areas ran out of ballot/paper to cast votes?
What was that all about?
139 posted on
02/09/2008 5:50:42 PM PST by
Global2010
(Election 2008 like playin Shoots and Ladders (ages 5 and up))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson