You’d not fight a “humanitarian mission” in order to keep islamo-fascists from taking total control of the middle east?
The subject here is how/why/if would we support McCain. Those who say “no way” etc need to grow-up.
I’ve “been around” for more years than some people can count. I’ve seen Presidents screw-up...I’ve presidents wreck the economy and everything else they touched....I’ve seen Presidents do okay, and I’ve seen Presidents do great.
The O N L Y thing that matters, HOWEVER we might feel is KEEP THE LIBERAL OUT OF THE WHITEHOUSE - IF AT ALL POSSIBLE.
The only hope, as much as we (me included) DON’T LIKE IT, there’ll only be two choices this fall.
We’ll be making a terrible mistake to vote for Hitlery or Obamasama by NOT voting Republican!
No......I would not fight a humanitarian mission. I believe in projecting our power punitively only. Rebuilding only after the war is over. Iraq has never been and never will be a productive, resourceful, industrious nation and that is because of Islam. Our past enemies fought in uniform for a standing army and those nations had they won the war, would not have went on to become self-destructive.
Imagine if half the people in the U.S belonged to gangs. How brutal would our central govt have to be to put them down? Pretty damn brutal! And since we will not ever be, a central govt in Iraq needs to fight the counter-insurgencies. I have no problem with our troops assisting them and getting them trained and on their feet but this is insane that we are still there after almost 6 years. For the love of God, we defeated two superpowers in WWll in less time. Liberalism has infected Republicans too and at the highest level of our govt to include our foreign policy makers and it’s going to get a lot of us killed. So all of you so concerned about being attacked again, better wake up to the damage liberalism is doing. It has conditioned our society for so long that we now think Pres. Bush and McCain are strong when it comes to our natl security strategy. Lord help us.